Kevin Gorman: Tyler Glasnow’s fast start puts pressure on Pirates | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Kevin Gorman: Tyler Glasnow’s fast start puts pressure on Pirates

Kevin Gorman

The word conviction repeatedly was referenced by the Pittsburgh Pirates on Sunday when talking about pitching, and especially when talking about trading pitchers.

Tyler Glasnow lacked it. Chris Archer possessed it and Neal Huntington used it to make a trade-deadline deal that was celebrated last July and now is being widely criticized.

“The day of the trade, we thought we were getting a top-of-the-rotation starter to pair with Jameson (Taillon) for three-plus years,” Huntington said Sunday, when asked about sending Glasnow, outfielder Austin Meadows and pitching prospect Shane Baz to Tampa Bay for Archer.

“We felt like we were getting a competitor and a good man that was going to add to the community, that was going to add to the clubhouse and was going to add to our win total. We still are thrilled that we have Chris Archer.”

The Rays are more thrilled to have Glasnow, who won American League Pitcher of the Month honors last week after starting the season with a major league-best 6-0 record, an AL-best 1.47 ERA with an 0.860 WHIP.

I don’t know what’s worse, that the 25-year-old right-hander finally is living up to his enormous potential elsewhere or that Archer struggled last August, started 1-2 with a 4.31 ERA this season and is on the injured list with right thumb inflammation.

Maybe it’s that the Pirates included Meadows, a former first-round pick who was batting .351 with six home runs and 19 RBIs through the first 20 games before spraining his thumb. Maybe it’s that Meadows was doing damage while the Pirates were fielding a patchwork outfield while dealing with injuries to starters Gregory Polanco, Corey Dickerson and Starling Marte.

All are sources of frustration for the Pirates and their fans — even though Huntington made the kind of prospects-for-veteran trade the club was often ridiculed for refusing to attempt, even as they shed pre-arbitration contracts for an $8.25 million salary.

Huntington noted the “dozen-plus pitchers that we’ve acquired from organizations have either bounced back or have had career bests here.” That could have been in his own defense of trades for All-Star closers Mark Melancon and Felipe Vazquez or an acquittal of Pirates pitching coach Ray Searage, who helped resurrect the careers of starting pitchers A.J. Burnett, Francisco Liriano, Edinson Volquez and J.A. Happ.

It’s too soon to judge the trade, though the early returns clearly favor the Rays. It certainly hasn’t worked out as Huntington had hoped, though he was at a loss to explain Glasnow’s overnight transformation from struggling fifth starter to dominant ace.

“We knew we were giving up three really talented prospects for Chris Archer,” Huntington said. “We felt Chris Archer was going to help push this club ahead earlier. We knew that those guys had ceilings, and we knew there was a chance they would reach them. Give Tampa Bay credit. Give these young men credit. They’ve reached their ceilings quicker than we certainly anticipated.”

The difference is Glasnow is pitching with confidence and conviction, both of which were missing when he was 3-11 with a 5.79 ERA and 1.705 WHIP in 17 starts over three seasons with the Pirates. They tried to get Glasnow going, from inserting him into the starting rotation to sending him to Triple-A Indianapolis in 2017 to moving him to the bullpen last season.

Nothing worked.

Where some suggest Glasnow simply needed a change of scenery, he told the Tampa Bay Times the difference is he has finally learned to pitch with confidence.

“I’d say every big-leaguer needs to realize that at some point,” Glasnow said. “Just the feeling of knowing you belong and the feeling of just believing in your stuff.”

Glasnow’s talent was unmistakable. Problem is, the Pirates believed in his stuff more than they believed Glasnow would figure out how to become a top-of-the-rotation starter.

Nobody would have loved that more than Taillon, who said on the day of the trade he wouldn’t be surprised if Glasnow found a way to flourish with the Rays.

Now, the Pirates are counting on the Archer they traded for. His addition has paid dividends in the community and the clubhouse, where Archer brought a veteran voice, leadership and professionalism to a young pitching staff.

But the Pirates paid a steep price for that.

“We were elated when we got Arch,” Taillon said. “We pushed our chips in.”

At the moment, the trade is lopsided in the Rays’ favor.

With Taillon likely out for most of the next two months, the Pirates need Archer to be their ace. And it wouldn’t hurt their cause if Glasnow came crashing back down to earth.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .


1109742_web1_1143160021
AP
ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA - APRIL 16: Tyler Glasnow #20 of the Tampa Bay Rays throws a pitch in the first inning against the Baltimore Orioles at Tropicana Field on April 16, 2019 in St. Petersburg, Florida.
1109742_web1_GTR-Bucs01-080418
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The price for acquiring pitcher Chris Archer has turned out to be two first-round draft picks and Tyler Glasnow.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.