Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Mike Tomlin won’t give an inch on why Steelers can’t get a yard | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Mike Tomlin won’t give an inch on why Steelers can’t get a yard

Kevin Gorman
1653868_web1_gtr-steelers27-091718
Tribune-Review
The Chiefs’ Terrance Smith puts a hit on the Steelers Roosevelt Nix in the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018 at Heinz Field.
1653868_web1_gtr-steelers27-100818
Tribune-Review
The Steelers’ Roosevelt Nix blocks the punt of the Falcons’ Matt Bosher in the third quarter Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018 at Heinz Field.

Mike Tomlin had the same response to the individual efforts of the Pittsburgh Steelers as he did their collective performance in their season-opening loss at the New England Patriots.

Zero. And. One.

It was as submissive as it was dismissive, the Steelers coach showing no one deserves accolades after a 30-point loss while acknowledging the Steelers stunk against the reigning Super Bowl champions on “Sunday Night Football.”

Tomlin wasn’t giving an inch, considering the Steelers couldn’t even get a yard.

Apparently, Roosevelt Nix’s knee is to blame.

1. Nix nixed

The Steelers looked like the walking wounded Sunday night, as everyone from Joe Haden to Maurkice Pouncey to JuJu Smith-Schuster to T.J. Watt endured an array of injuries.

None of them was serious, except for Nix.

And I didn’t realize he injured his knee, given he got no snaps at fullback and played only on special teams.

The good news is, Tomlin didn’t rule out any of the Pro Bowl-caliber players from Sunday’s game against the Seattle Seahawks. The bad news? Nix might miss a few.

2. Coming up short

Tomlin counted four or five situations where the Steelers failed to convert on third- or fourth-and-1 as their foremost failure.

Coming up short didn’t allow the Steelers to sustain drives or win the time-of-possession battle, let alone score points.

“I didn’t think our plan was good enough, and I didn’t think the execution of the plan was good enough,” Tomlin said. “I don’t know how to be any more black and white than that.”

Tomlin cited the fourth-and-1 at the Patriots’ 47 late in the second quarter as an example. The Steelers initially sent out a jumbo package, but a Patriots linebacker plugged the gap so quarterback Ben Roethlisberger called a timeout.

When the Steelers went to a five-receiver set, the Patriots stayed in their nickel defense. Tomlin said the Steelers ran a “nice zone concept” to counter, but Donte Moncrief dropped Roethlisberger’s pass for a turnover on downs.

“Is it a good plan? Only if it works,” Tomlin said. “If you don’t catch the football, it’s a bad plan.”

3. Fullback fallback

The short-yardage plan could have been different if Nix was available at fullback.

Of course, that requires some imagination.

Nix played 110 offensive snaps last season. That’s one more snap than receiver Eli Rogers, who missed the first 13 games while recovering from a torn ACL.

The Steelers barely use a fullback, as evidenced by Nix’s one carry for 4 yards and four catches for 38 yards last season. Even so, Tomlin was asked which Steelers player would line up at fullback in Nix’s absence.

The possibilities are endless, but Tomlin hinted it could be a tight end. Xavier Grimble would be my guess, although Jaylen Samuels is another possibility.

“If we need a fullback,” Tomlin said, “there will be somebody representing that position on Sunday, I assure you that.”

4. Nothing special

If the Steelers are going to miss Nix, it will be on special teams, where he’s a captain.

Nix got 68.9% of the special-teams snaps last season, the fourth-most on the team behind L.J. Fort (72.5%), Anthony Chickillo (71.2%) and Tyler Matakevich (69.1%) and just ahead of Jordan Dangerfield (68.6%).

Only Fort isn’t with the Steelers this season, yet the special teams didn’t make much of a difference against the Patriots. They didn’t block any kicks or force any fumbles.

“We’ve got a veteran special-teams core unit. It’s reasonable to expect those guys to be positive contributors to our efforts in terms of splash or field-position plays or game-changing plays,” Tomlin said. “We just didn’t get it. There was nothing really in the special-teams game that was below the line, but we didn’t get the splash that was desired.”

5. Dot on Watt

The Steelers designated T.J. Watt to wear the green dot, indicating he was wearing the headset in his helmet to communicate with coaches.

That an outside linebacker was handling the calls is unusual, as the dot is typically worn by an inside linebacker.

But continuity was a concern, with Mark Barron, Devin Bush and Vince Williams rotating at inside linebacker and AAF alum Kameron Kelly starting at free safety in place of the injured Sean Davis.

“I don’t want to make more out of that than what it is,” Tomlin said. “(Watt) was the most indispensable second-level defender, a guy that’s positioned within the group to communicate with those in front and those behind.”

Tomlin wouldn’t pin the defensive breakdowns on Watt, however, saying that “there’s always communication problems early in the year.”

Either way, the Steelers are zero and one.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.