ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman: Penguins GM Jim Rutherford keeps trading away his mistakes | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Kevin Gorman: Penguins GM Jim Rutherford keeps trading away his mistakes

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:18 p.m
804942_web1_AP_18129691438226

With the Penguins tied for the eighth and final playoff spot in the Eastern Conference entering Tuesday’s game, general manager Jim Rutherford wasn’t able to make any magical trade-deadline deals.

Rutherford added much-needed toughness in Erik Gudbranson, but the Penguins dealing for defensemen at the NHL trade deadline was a sorry sign, as it was once a position of strength.

When the Penguins started the season with Kris Letang, Brian Dumoulin, Justin Schultz, Jack Johnson, Olli Maatta, Jamie Oleksiak, Juuso Riikola and Chad Ruhwedel, it was considered the kind of defensive depth that would allow them to use one (or more) as trade bait.

Instead, Rutherford continues to trade away his mistakes and dig the Penguins deeper into a hole.

1. Getting abused

After complaining during the 2017 Stanley Cup playoffs that his star players were being “abused,” Rutherford traded center Oskar Sundqvist and a first-round draft pick to St. Louis for noted tough guy Ryan Reaves in June.

Reaves averaged only 6 minutes, 45 seconds of ice time over 58 games with the Penguins, and Rutherford traded him as part of a three-way deal for Derick Brassard.

Where Sundqvist has become a solid fourth-line center and top penalty killer for the Blues, Reaves helped the Vegas Golden Knights reach the Cup Final.

In Gudbranson, the Penguins traded for a player Rutherford described as a “real heart-and-soul guy” and a “good dressing-room guy” with “good character” who can “protect our players.”

2. Bottom-six busts

The Penguins might have the NHL’s best 1-2 combination at center in Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, but finding a third-line center has been an issue since Nick Bonino left.

After Greg McKegg flopped, Rutherford traded for Riley Sheahan. When Sheahan showed to be better suited for the fourth line, Rutherford made the trade-deadline deal for Brassard.

Instead of solving the Penguins’ problems, it caused more. Brassard battled through an injury last season, but the biggest block was mental. Brassard was unwilling to accept his role as a third-line center instead of his customary top-six status.

No wonder Rutherford received rave reviews when he traded Sheahan and Brassard for Nick Bjugstad and Jared McCann, instead of getting grilled for Brassard being a bust.

3. Getting defensive

By including Ian Cole in the Brassard trade, the Penguins gave up a steady, stay-at-home defenseman willing to block shots and kill penalties.

But Cole was a pending free agent, and the Penguins had no plans to sign him to an extension. Instead, Rutherford signed defenseman Jack Johnson to a five-year, $16.25-million contract. Johnson has been underwhelming, and it should be worrisome the Penguins are tied to the 32-year-old for four more seasons.

The last time Rutherford traded for a big, tough defenseman, the Penguins got Jamie Oleksiak from Dallas for a fourth-round pick in December 2017. Thirteen months and 83 regular-season games later, they sent Oleksiak back to the Stars … for a fourth-rounder.

4. Ho-hum reaction

Rutherford’s moves Monday were met with mostly a ho-hum reaction, not so much because of what he got but what little he had to give up.

Trading Tanner Pearson produced a shrug, as he had nine goals and 14 points in 44 games. But to get Pearson the Penguins gave up a glue guy, penalty killer and proven playoff performer in Carl Hagelin, who was traded to Washington at the deadline.

So the Penguins turned Hagelin, whom they might have to face in the playoffs, into Pearson, whom they turned into Gudbranson. The key is Gudbranson should be an upgrade over Oleksiak in protecting players, given he has beaten Tom Wilson in a fight.

Unfortunately, that’s become important.

5. Benefit of the doubt

Rutherford has earned the benefit of the doubt and deserves credit for trades that have worked out well.

That’s especially true for sending the disappointing Daniel Sprong to Anaheim for defenseman Marcus Pettersson but also for flipping Brassard and Sheahan to Florida for Bjugstad and McCann.

Rutherford inherited a team strong up the middle, and adding Phil Kessel and Justin Schultz proved masterful when the Penguins won back-to-back Stanley Cup championships.

But it’s Rutherford’s job to supply their supporting cast, and that’s where he has shown some shortcomings. The Penguins have to hope his latest deal is enough to get them into the playoffs, and keep them healthy enough to make another run.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.