Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Steelers offer no guarantees as circus leaves town | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Steelers offer no guarantees as circus leaves town

Kevin Gorman
822938_web1_AP_16340046439392
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown, right, and New York Giants wide receiver Odell Beckham swap jerseys following an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016. The Steelers won 24-14.
822938_web1_AP_18263669391771
AP
Left, Pittsburgh Steelers running back Le’Veon Bell (26) plays in an NFL football game against the Jacksonville Jaguars, Sunday, Jan. 14, 2018, in Pittsburgh. Right, Los Angeles Rams running back Todd Gurley runs against the Arizona Cardinals during the first half of an NFL football game Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018, in Los Angeles.
822938_web1_AP_18287745725887
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) reacts with Pittsburgh Steelers offensive guard Ramon Foster (73) in the second half of an NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, in Cincinnati.

The more the Pittsburgh Steelers talk about Antonio Brown, Le’Veon Bell and Ben Roethlisberger, the more they deny that one of the NFL’s flagship franchises has become the NFL version of a three-ring circus.

Whether it’s Art Rooney II or Kevin Colbert doing the talking, the Steelers are starting to sound like a team in denial.

The surest sign of a dysfunctional organization is when everyone around the league recognizes the dysfunction, yet you maintain that it’s all just being blown out of proportion.

That’s your Steelers.

But they have a point: For all of the drama and distractions involving Brown, Bell and Ben, this is all about money.

1. Fall from grace: It was only three years ago that the Steelers had a dynamic offense that featured arguably the league’s best running back and receiver, with a quarterback headed for the Hall of Fame.

Even so, the Steelers sputtered to a 4-5 start before winning seven consecutive games on their way to an AFC championship game loss at New England.

The Steelers started as a Super Bowl favorite the following season, but Le’Veon Bell skipped the offseason in protest of the franchise tag being placed upon him. Despite going 13-3, they lost at home to Jacksonville in an AFC divisional playoff.

That was the beginning of the end.

When Bell declined to sign a second franchise-tag tender, even at $14.54 million, it sent a strong message to the Steelers and the NFL that their way of doing business was no longer the model.

2. Paid in full: So much focus has been on the contract offers Bell turned down when the only money that matters is the guaranteed.

When the Steelers gave Brown a four-year, $68-million contract extension in February 2017, the only guaranteed money he received was the $19 million signing bonus.

That was a sticking point for Bell, who wanted more guaranteed money. There have been reports that he turned down a five-year, $70-million deal, as well as a three-year, $47-million offer. But Bell balked at the guaranteed money, which wasn’t good enough.

When Todd Gurley signed a four-year deal worth $60 million – which included $45 million guaranteed – it not only proved Bell’s point but planted a seed with Brown.

3. No need to restructure: It’s important to remember Brown helped the Steelers (and himself) by restructuring his contract last March, turning $6.96 million in salary and a $6 million roster bonus into a signing bonus.

That allowed the Steelers to save salary cap space for Bell, if he signed his franchise-tag tender. And it gave Brown more guaranteed money at age 30.

By deciding not to use the transition tag on Bell and allowing him to become a free agent, the Steelers have created cap space.

But Brown wants more money.

4. Here’s why: Brown believes he’s the best receiver in the NFL.

And he wants to get paid like it.

As for contract values, according to overthecap.com, Brown’s $68 million ranks below Odell Beckham Jr. ($90 million/$41 million fully guaranteed), Mike Evans ($82.5 million/$55 million fully guaranteed), DeAndre Hopkins and Brandin Cooks (both $81 million), with Hopkins having $36.5 million fully guaranteed and Cooks getting $20.5 million fully guaranteed.

They all will be either 26 or 27 this season, and Brown turns 31 in July.

Brown’s contract might have an average annual salary of $17 million, but he’s set to make $12.625 in salary plus a $2.5 million roster bonus, $11.3 million next year and $12.5 million in 2021.

For all of his antics, that’s what affects his trade value the most. Where Brown should be an attractive addition, teams know that he is going to want a new contract with more guaranteed money.

5. Pay the QB: The Steelers have made it clear they intend to re-sign Roethlisberger, who turns 37 on March 2.

Roethlisberger could command somewhere in the neighborhood of $25 million to $30 million a year on a short-term deal, which would allow the Steelers to give new deals to center Maurkice Pouncey and left guard Ramon Foster.

The Steelers have no choice but to pay their franchise quarterback after a season in which he led the NFL in passing yards, attempts and completions (not to mention interceptions), but it’s amazing to consider that they could part ways with the All-Pro running back and All-Pro receiver who are still in their primes to keep a quarterback who will be pushing 40 when his next deal expires.

It’s a sign that the Steelers will continue to do business their way, offering no guarantees and pretending that there is no circus as it leaves town.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.