Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Waiting for internal options, Pirates struck out looking |
Kevin Gorman, Columnist

Kevin Gorman’s Take 5: Waiting for internal options, Pirates struck out looking

Kevin Gorman
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates left fielder Corey Dickerson accepts his Gold Glove award with his family, next to Andy Van Slyke during a pre-game ceremony before the home opener against the Cardinals Monday, April 1, 28, 2019, at PNC Park.

The Pittsburgh Pirates left PNC Park on Thursday afternoon dressed in disguise, wearing superhero costumes for their flight to Milwaukee to begin a 10-game road trip.

We might not recognize them when they return.

Corey Dickerson is expected to be activated from the injured list for Friday’s game against the Brewers. Jung Ho Kang might not be far behind. Chris Stratton should be back soon, too. And Trevor Williams is targeted to return within two weeks.

That means the Pirates are getting close to being healthy and have to make multiple roster decisions over the next two weeks. Right now, it’s the moves they didn’t make that could end up hurting the Pirates.

1. Struck out looking: Despite their pitching woes in both the rotation and bullpen, the Pirates were never players for top available free agents Dallas Keuchel and Craig Kimbrel.

Kimbrel signed to be the closer for the Chicago Cubs (34-27) for three years, $43 million with a fourth-year option. Keuchel signed a one-year deal with the Atlanta Braves (33-29) for $13 million.

That would have been a hefty price for the Pirates (30-31) to pay, but their payroll is in the $75 million range. They could have afforded Keuchel, but ownership has made it clear that it has no intention of spending on payroll.

Instead, there is another price to pay. Both Kimbrel and Keuchel ended up in the National League. What the Pirates won’t pay for, they’ll end up playing against.

The Pirates certainly could have used Keuchel, a 31-year-old left-hander who won the 2015 AL Cy Young.

Signing Keuchel would have been a one-year investment that would have taken the pressure off the starters while Jameson Taillon is on the 60-day injured list.

But there was some risk involved as Keuchel was 12-11 with a 3.74 ERA last season, when he lost eight of his first 13 starts for the Houston Astros. With Keuchel scheduled to start Saturday for the Braves’ Triple-A affiliate in Gwinnett, the Pirates should avoid him on their road trip.

They won’t be so lucky with Kimbrel in the NL Central.

2. Crowded outfield: Dickerson might be ready to return, but he’s not ready for full-time duty in left field.

For one, Dickerson slashed .182/.237/.212 in nine games at Indianapolis so he still has to show his timing is back.

For another, given that he’s coming off a shoulder injury, the Pirates have a plan to ease Dickerson back into the lineup the way they did with Gregory Polanco.

And with Bryan Reynolds riding a 14-game hitting streak, it shouldn’t even be a consideration to take his bat out of the lineup. Dickerson, however, is a Gold Glove winner and will be a defensive upgrade in left field.

The Pirates could keep five outfielders to allow Dickerson a grace period, turning that from their greatest concern at the start of the season into one of their biggest strengths.

But will it come at the expense of another position player?

3. Making moves: Sending infielder Jose Osuna and reliever Geoff Hartlieb back to Triple-A Indianapolis are likely moves to clear room for Dickerson and Stratton.

When Williams is ready to return, the Pirates could option Rookie Davis, Alex McRae or Clay Holmes. How Davis fares in his start against the Brewers on Friday could help or hurt his cause.

The big question is what the Pirates will do to make room when Kang is ready.

4. Who’s on third?: The Pirates can send rookie Cole Tucker (.198 batting average) to Indy to get him regular at-bats, but only if they believe that Kang can be a serviceable backup shortstop.

Kang is slashing .478/.556/.739 with one homer and six RBIs in seven games at Indianapolis, and the Pirates would like to get his bat back in the lineup.

But it shouldn’t come at the expense of Colin Moran, who is slashing .325/.358/.571 with five home runs and 17 RBIs since Kang went on the IL on May 14.

5. Second chance: Mitch Keller’s major league debut at Cincinnati was a disaster, at least for the first inning, but the Pirates should bring back their top prospect soon.

Their patchwork pitching rotation hasn’t helped their cause, as the Pirates (30-31) are 16-17 since Taillon’s last start on May 1 and 9-11 since Williams left the game at San Diego on May 16.

In his last start, Keller allowed two runs on three hits in six innings, with five strikeouts and two walks for his first Triple-A loss this season, 4-2, to Gwinnett on June 2. Keller threw 67 of his 99 pitches for strikes.

Keller is scheduled to start Saturday for Indianapolis against Toledo, which would make him available for the Pirates for Wednesday’s game at Atlanta.

The best-case scenario, however, would be to have Keller make his PNC Park debut when the Pirates return home to play the Detroit Tigers on June 18.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.