ShareThis Page
News

Gorman: Steel Valley's biggest benefactor to be missed

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, April 19, 2016, 8:12 p.m.

Bill Campbell had never formally met Ed Wehrer, but they shared commonalities as senior class presidents and captains of the football team who played in the Ivy League.

Upon formal introduction, Campbell put Wehrer in a headlock and dragged him over to introduce him to friends.

It was the beginning, as they say, of a beautiful friendship.

Campbell became Steel Valley's biggest benefactor. What started with a check for $11,200 to fund new video equipment for the football team Wehrer coached resulted in donations of $30 million to the school district and community through the Campbell Educational and Community Foundation.

On Monday, William V. Campbell Jr., a giant from Steel Valley to Silicon Valley, lost his battle with cancer. He was 75.

“Bill was this unusual mix of athletic toughness, academic brilliance and work ethic that can't be adequately described, charismatic and caring in nature,” said Wehrer, now Steel Valley's superintendent. “The man was a machine, a force of nature. He never forgot us.”

Campbell, a Homestead native, never forgot where he came from. He donated $1 million for renovations to the football stadium named for his father, Steel Valley's former superintendent, so the Ironmen could play on Friday nights, and millions more to the district for technological improvements.

“We would be struggling to maintain the school district, period,” Wehrer said, “if not for his commitments and generosity.

“Bill had a gift of making you feel like you were a special person and a new friend of his within two minutes of meeting him — even if he didn't put you in a headlock.”

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me