Knoch grad Jordan Geist claims shot put silver at Pan American Games | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Knoch grad Jordan Geist claims shot put silver at Pan American Games

Michael Love
1513874_web1_ptr-Geist-080819
Submitted
Knoch grad Jordan Geist (left) took second in the shot put at the Pan American Games Aug. 7, 2019, in Lima, Peru.

Knoch grad Jordan Geist captured a silver medal in the men’s shot put Wednesday evening at the Pan American Games in Lima, Peru.

In third after the three throws of the opening round and fourth overall after the first two throws of the finals, Geist unleashed a throw of 20.67 meters (67 feet, 8 inches) on his final attempt of the competition.

Brazil’s Darlan Romani, fifth in the shot at the 2016 Summer Olympics, won gold and set a new Pan American Games record with a toss of 22.07 meters.

Geist, a rising junior at Arizona, qualified for the finals with an attempt of 20.16 (66-1) on his second throw of the opening round.

He slipped to fourth after his fourth throw (19.27), as Mexico’s Galarza Munoz moved into medal position with a throw of 20.32.

Munoz and Geist remained third and fourth, respectively, after round five. Munoz recorded his best of the meet — 20.56 — in his sixth and final throw.

Canadian Timothy Nedow took fourth (20.48), while Jamaican O’Dayne Richards, who came into the competition as the Pan American record holder, finished fifth (20.07).

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-856-7400 x8632, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.