Lack of clarity on pass interference ‘frustrating’ to Mike Tomlin, Steelers | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Lack of clarity on pass interference ‘frustrating’ to Mike Tomlin, Steelers

Joe Rutter
1748188_web1_gtr-Steelers01-100219
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin talks with former head coach Bill Cowher before the Bengals game Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 at Heinz Field.
1748188_web1_gtr-Steelers04-100219
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers coach Mike Tomlin speaks to the media during his weekly news conference Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Coach Mike Tomlin is still trying to get a grasp on the new NFL rule that subjects pass plays to replay review when determining whether interference was committed.

He sounded as frustrated as ever Tuesday at his weekly news conference when asked about the latest ruling that went against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Upon replay review, an offensive pass interference call against wide receiver Johnny Holton was upheld in the first quarter of the Steelers’ 27-3 victory against the Cincinnati Bengals. Holton appeared only to make slight contact with the defensive back as they went for the ball.

Tomlin challenged the call — only to lose it and a timeout. It was the 11th consecutive challenge Tomlin lost dating to the 2017 postseason. Even the addition of Teryl Austin to assist with challenges didn’t work in Tomlin’s favor.

Tomlin’s frustration was evident Tuesday when he was asked whether the ruling would affect if throws the challenge flag in the future.

“I have no idea what it’s going to look like moving forward. If anybody does, I’d appreciate it,” Tomlin said. “I don’t think any of us has a feel for what that looks like, and I’m just being honest. I don’t have any idea moving forward. It appears to be a moving target.”

Two weeks earlier, the Steelers thought they had forced a third-down incompletion on a deep pass by Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson. Seahawks coach Pete Carroll challenged the call, and interference was called against safety Terrell Edmunds upon replay review. The drive continued and the Seahawks scored a touchdown to increase their lead to nine points in a 28-26 win.

Tomlin is a member of the NFL Competition Committee that was tasked with drawing up the rule proposal. He was not a proponent of additional replay review, and his stance hasn’t changed.

“It’s just frustrating as a football coach,” he said. “There’s a lot of things that are frustrating. We’re trying to get it right. It’s just difficult to nail down at this juncture.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.