Latrobe’s Bryan Grejtak looks to defend county senior golf title | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

Latrobe’s Bryan Grejtak looks to defend county senior golf title

Paul Schofield
1585850_web1_gtr-BryanGrejtak-082418
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Bryan Grejtak of Latrobe will try to defend his title at the Westmoreland County Senior Amateur golf tournament.

Bryan Grejtak had just turned 50 when he won the Westmoreland County Senior Amateur last year.

Now he has a bull’s eye on his polo as he attempts for a repeat title Sunday at the Latrobe Elks.

Grejtak of Latrobe finished the 27-hole event by shooting a 3-under-par 105. He edged 2017 champion Dave Antill and Greensburg’s Arnie Cutrell, who each shot a 2-under 106.

A field of 24 will compete for the title.

Two players who won’t be competing are Vince Zachetti, who is on vacation, and Sean Knapp, who is playing in the United States Golf Association’s Senior Amateur in Durham, N.C.

“We have a good field,” tournament director Bob Allshouse said. “We changed our format, so we expected a drop off in competitors.”

The change was to drop handicaps for the tournament.

The Super Senior winner last year was Greensburg’s Mike McGuire, who won on a scorecard playoff to become the second Latrobe Elks member to win the title. Tim Bryan won in ‘16.

Grejtak did his damage on the back nine during both rounds. He strung together three consecutive birdies (Nos. 16-17-18) to finish round one. He had two birdies on the final nine, including a tap-in birdie on No. 18 to seal the victory.

“I knew I had to birdie the final hole because I knew Arnie and Dave would,” Grejtak said. “I thought Arnie made the eagle putt on the final hole and we were headed to a playoff. He had great speed. It just missed.”

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.