Lesson learned, opportunities remain for Pitt basketball | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Lesson learned, opportunities remain for Pitt basketball

Jerry DiPaola
829397_web1_829397-4f4578c48b5843d5ba77f8c896889c25
AP
Virginia guard Ty Jerome (left) passes the ball to Virginia center Jack Salt (right) around Pitt forward Kene Chukwuka (15) during the half of an NCAA college basketball game in Charlottesville, Va., Saturday, March 2, 2019.
829397_web1_827141-4f65afd8b4a847ce84085ce7ceed919f
AP
Pitt guard Xavier Johnson, right, fights for a rebound with Virginia forward Mamadi Diakite, left, during the first half in Charlottesville, Va., Saturday, March 2, 2019. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Virginia had such an easy time with Pitt on Saturday that coach Tony Bennett found time to rest his starters for their quick turnaround game Monday at Syracuse.

Even Jeff Capel used nonscholarship players Anthony Starzynski and Onyebuchi Ezeakudo in Pitt’s second-worst loss of the season, 73-49 to the nation’s second-ranked team.

But Capel will use the last few days of the season as a teaching tool, and Virginia offered the first lesson.

“This is what elite looks like,” he said after the game. “This is what we aspire to get to.”

Capel will make sure his Panthers pay attention because there are opportunities ahead, and they don’t have to wait until next season:

• Get out of last place in the ACC.

• Make a respectable showing in the conference tournament.

Both should matter a great deal to the Panthers. Here are three reasons why:

1. Freshmen have something to prove

It’s been a long season for Xavier Johnson, Trey McGowens and Au’Diese Toney, and some of the residual effects showed Saturday.

Johnson and McGowens each scored three points, with Johnson scoring only on free throws and McGowens attempting one shot inside the 3-point arc. Johnson was averaging 16.5 points.

Both are too talented and too competitive to leave this season in that way. The freshman wall is formidable, and Pitt’s players have hit it hard. They should want to prove it’s not tougher than they are.

2. Winnable games ahead

Pitt (12-17, 2-14) is in last place in the ACC but not without a good chance to escape.

Next up is Miami (12-16, 4-12), which is coming off an 87-57 thrashing at Duke on Saturday. Pitt has the added incentive of trying to end its road-game losing streak at 23.

Pitt’s last home game is next Saturday against Notre Dame (13-16, 3-13), which has lost five in a row.

Is Pitt the worst team in the ACC for the second consecutive season? We’ll find out this week.

If Pitt can win one or both games, maybe they can carry momentum into the ACC Tournament and do better than one-and-done while the rest of the college basketball nation watches.

3. Capel staying positive

Pitt scored fewer than 50 points in consecutive games for the first time since 2012, but Capel didn’t sound discouraged.

“I, actually, thought we did some good things,” he said. “We had good ball movement.”

The problem was finishing. He said he could recall six missed layups during the game.

The reality is Pitt is the 1oth team held below 50 by Virginia this season.

Capel also didn’t assign too much blame to his defense.

“Really good players can make defense look bad,” he said, referencing Virginia’s Kyle Guy, De’Andre Hunter and Ty Jerome, who combined for 42 points. “I don’t think it was our defense, but they’re really good.”

Get the latest news about Pitt basketball and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.