Like the NFL, its uniforms have evolved over 100 years |

Like the NFL, its uniforms have evolved over 100 years

Associated Press
AP file
Color Rush is the latest trend in NFL uniforms
AP file
NFL uniforms have become more form-fitting, so defenders can’t drag players down by their shirts, like Steelers Hall of Fame defensive back Mel Blount tried to do to Houston Oilers running back Earl Campbell in this 1979 game.
AP file
Some NFL uniforms have ascended to iconic status, like the Raiders’ silver and black.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Tex Schramm often called Gil Brandt into his office to look at the fabric swatches draped all over his furniture, wanting another opinion on the right jersey and pants combination for the Dallas Cowboys.

He hit on a winning combination. Decades later, Cowboys jerseys remain among the NFL’s top sellers.

“The uniform thing was a special project to him,” said Brandt, now historian and player analyst for after helping Schramm build the Cowboys. “I can’t tell you how much time I spent with him looking at these uniforms and saying, ‘Yeah, I think this is the best. This will show up the best on television.’ ”

As the NFL enters its 100th season, what players wear on the field might have changed the most, going from leather helmets and long-sleeved turtlenecks and sweaters to plastic helmets with jerseys and pants almost shrink-wrapped to fit. The main reason why players wear a jersey remains unchanged a century later: to tell who plays for which team.

“You want something to identify yourself, right?” said Jon Kendle, director of archives and football information at the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Alphabetically, and not by order of sales, Dallas, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Seattle and New England are the NFL teams with the best-selling jerseys over the past five years. Competing for or winning championships certainly helps popularity. And some looks are simply built to last, making for an iconic look mien the Oakland Raiders.

“When you say ‘Raiders’ anywhere in the world, you think silver and black,” said Amy Trask, former Raiders chief executive officer and now an analyst with CBS Sports.

The Raiders’ look was so recognizable that owner Al Davis chose tradition when approached with the idea of pairing the black jersey with black pants or silver on silver — Color Rush years before the NFL unveiled that look in 2015. Trask said she smiled during those talks.

“He simply wasn’t interested in doing that,” Trask said. “Fair enough. His call. He was the owner. He heard us out. He listened to our presentation. He said no. And then I got in my parting words: ‘Fair enough. But then when we don’t maximize revenues in this area we can’t bemoan the fact that we’re not maximizing revenues in this area.’”

Wanting to be fan-friendly has driven other changes.

Names went on the back of jerseys in 1970. Players also chose their own numbers for decades, with quarterback Otto Graham wearing No. 60. Brandt credits Schramm and Don Weiss with devising the numbering system adopted in 1973 (and subsequently tweaked) limiting players to numbers by position. That’s why quarterbacks and specialists wear a number between one and 19.

NFL teams now have up to four uniforms, with a color and a white required for home and the road. When NFL games first hit TV, home teams wore their color uniform with the road team in white to help viewers distinguish the teams. Then Schramm wanted the Cowboys to wear white at home.

“Our explanation was that we wanted our fans to have the ability to understand what the Bears jerseys looked like, what the Cardinals jerseys looks like, what the Packers jerseys look like,” Brandt said. “When in reality, we did it because we thought it created an advantage for us in that they had to sit on the sunny side of the field, and we got to sit in the shade.”

Now teams, especially in the South, often wear white at home early in the season to turn up the heat on their opponents.

Helmets became mandatory in 1943, and Los Angeles Rams halfback Fred Gehrke painted horns on his helmet in 1948.

“That sort of spawned a whole new creation of, ‘Wait a minute. We can use this leather helmet as a canvas to represent our brand,’ ” said Shandon Melvin, the NFL’s creative director. “And from that point on, you started to see these things pop up, and there was much more of an interesting take on how teams would differentiate themselves.”

Pittsburgh owner Art Rooney wasn’t sure if he wanted a variation of the U.S. Steel logo on the Steelers helmet, so players wore it on the right side only in 1963 as a test. The Steelers went 7-4-3 that season for a rare winning record and stuck with that look.

Teams are allowed two optional uniforms with choices of an alternate color, a throwback or the Color Rush featuring one color.

Not all throwbacks are possible. The Tennessee Titans can’t wear the Columbia blue and oil derrick of the Houston Oilers because the franchise switched from white to a blue helmet with a uniform redesign in April 2018, and the NFL has a one-helmet rule. Teams like the Bears simply can strip the decal off the helmet for a classic look.

Some throwbacks didn’t work as well as others. The Steelers used a 1933 throwback with black-and-gold horizontal stripes that made them look like bees, a look switched in May 2018 for a throwback to their 1978-1979 championship teams. Jonathan Wright, the NFL’s director of uniforms and on-field product, said the Steelers loved their look and sometimes teams just want to give their fans something else.

“They’re not looking to change because they think it’s not necessarily a success,” Wright said. “They’re looking within their limitation of how many uniforms they can have to give the fans something else that they can connect to.”

The Los Angeles Chargers are going back to their past, wearing the powder blue as their primary home jersey this season. Fans have kept the jersey popular through the years, a look Brandt said he likes the most — aside from the Cowboys.

Today uniform changes are no longer as simple as checking fabric samples. The NFL’s creative division, started by then-commissioner Pete Rozelle in the 1960s, helps teams design new looks in a process that can take up to five years. Tampa Bay had the biggest redesign, switching from white and creamsicle orange with a pirate in 1996 to a waving, tattered flag with pewter and red colors in 1997. The Bucs tweaked that again in March 2014.

Melvin said owners want a uniform that will stand the test of time and be as relevant in 20 years as today. The challenge is getting fans to accept change.

“What we’ve learned is that fans are typically pretty resistant to change, and they’ll really warm up to it over the course of a few years,” Melvin said.

The biggest difference from a century ago might be noticed only by the players themselves — and the equipment staff. Wool and cotton were the materials of choice for years, in turtlenecks and sweaters to more modern jerseys. The development of nylons and polyesters, whisking away sweat without becoming heavy, now allows designers to leave little for defenders to grab, unlike the 1970s when Earl Campbell often lost pieces of his jersey.

Wright said to credit Nike for reducing the number of seams in today’s uniform, from 21 individual pieces of fabric sewn together for a jersey and pair of pants a few years ago now down to approximately five.

“You’d be surprised at how impactful that is from a weight standpoint, from a strength and tenacity standpoint,” Wright said. “That’s a game changer that doesn’t really get a lot of credit.”

With TV going from black and white past high-definition to 4K, expect NFL uniforms to grow beyond the numbers, name and logo.

“It’s allowing us to put details in and textures and materials into things that wouldn’t have been seen by most fans years before,” Melvin said. “So we were trying to take advantage of that opportunity where we can.”

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.