List of top 40 quarterbacks puts Ben Roethlisberger at No. 6 |

List of top 40 quarterbacks puts Ben Roethlisberger at No. 6

Joe Rutter
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throws during OTA work outs Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Ben Roethlisberger made an appearance on a quarterback rankings list that already generated some controversy before his inclusion on it.

Chris Simms, a former NFL quarterback and current NBC analyst, unveiled the final six spots on his Top 40 list this week with Roethlisberger accompanying the No. 6 position.

Ranked ahead of the Pittsburgh Steelers veteran passer were Houston’s DeShaun Watson at No. 5, Indianapolis’ Andrew Luck at No. 4, Seattle’s Russell Wilson at No. 3, Kansas City’s Patrick Mahomes at No. 2 and Green Bay’s Aaron Rodgers at No. 1.

Roethlisberger has won two Super Bowls – the same as Simms’ top five combined. Rodgers and Wilson have won one apiece. Roethlisberger also led the NFL in passing yards in 2018. Rodgers threw only two interceptions but, like Roethlisberger, didn’t guide his team to the playoffs.

Simms’ list generated controversy last week when he ranked Tom Brady at No. 9 and Drew Brees at No. 10. Falling in between Roethlisberger and Brady is Matt Ryan at No. 7 and Cam Newton at No. 8. Simms and former NFL quarterback Kurt Warner traded Twitter barbs about where Brady and Brees were ranked.

“The whole Top 10 is nitpicking,” Simms said in a statement released by NBC Sports. “These are All-Stars and great players, but as awesome I think Mahomes is, I think that if Aaron Rodgers was on the Chiefs in the AFC championship game, that they would have won that game.

“These are my two favorite quarterbacks in football. It was a very tough call, but I’m still not ready to relinquish the title from Aaron Rodgers.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.