ShareThis Page
Local trio among at-large wrestlers to receive bids for NCAAs | TribLIVE.com
District College

Local trio among at-large wrestlers to receive bids for NCAAs

Paul Schofield
| Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:16 p.m.
871278_web1_web-Wrestling01

Three district wrestlers were among the 45 to receive at-large bids Tuesday for the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships, which are March 21-23 at PPG Paints Arena.

Hempfield graduate Sam Krivus (Virginia), Mt. Lebanon’s Kellan Stout (Pitt) and South Park’s Greg Bulsak (Clarion) were selected.

This is the third year Krivus, a 2015 Hempfield graduate, has qualified for the tournament, despite going 0-2 in the ACC Tournament at 141 pounds. The previous seasons, Krivus qualified at 149.

The redshirt junior is 16-8 this season and 59-37 in his career.

Stout, a 2015 PIAA champion, is making his first trip to the tournament. He was one of five wrestlers at 197 pounds to earn bids.

Stout transferred to Pitt from Penn State. The redshirt junior went 0-2 at the ACC Tournament. He is 12-8 this season.

Bulsak, a redshirt sophomore, went 17-6 this season and was ranked 16th in the most recent NCAA coaches’ panel at 197.

Edinboro redshirt freshman Jacob Oliver will make his first appearance at nationals. The Huntingdon native was the top seed and reached the finals of the EWLs before losing to Dean Sherry of Rider at 174 pounds. Oliver is 28-5.

West Virginia freshman Nick Kiussis (18-8) was added at 165 pounds, and former Mountaineer Zeke Moisey (13-1, 97-47), who transferred to Nebraska this season, earned his fourth trip to nationals.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at pschofield@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.