London marathon runners quench thirst with sports drink in edible seaweed pods |

London marathon runners quench thirst with sports drink in edible seaweed pods

Mary Ann Thomas
Photo courtesy of Skipping Rocks Lab
Ooho seaweed pods filled with a sports drink were given to runners in the London marathon.

No, the runners did not have to eat them, but they could.

The golf ball-sized pouches made from seaweed and filled with a sports drink were handed out to thousands of runners for the London marathon on April 28.

The marathon offered “race organizers and company officials a mass experiment in the use of an alternative sustainable material,” according to an article in the Washington Post.

The pods, known as Ooho, are biodegradable and dissolve in about a month.

The pods were created by a London-based start-up called Skipping Rocks Lab, according to the Post.

There is no screw cap. Runners had to bite into the pouch or chew it their mouth to get to the sports drink, and apparently did just that at Mile 23.

A video by Skipping Rocks lab shows runners taking the pods.

The success of the pods could bode well for the future as plastic water bottles continue to grow as a major source of litter and pollution.

According to a 2017 article by The Guardian, the number of plastic bottles bought around the world will jump by another 20 percent by 2021.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.