ShareThis Page
Looking at the Pirates’ logic for keeping pitcher Mitch Keller in the minors | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Looking at the Pirates’ logic for keeping pitcher Mitch Keller in the minors

Tim Benz
1129105_web1_AP_19067757972788
AP
Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher Mitch Keller during the fifth inning of a spring training baseball game against the Toronto Blue Jays Friday, March 8, 2019, in Bradenton, Fla. (AP Photo/Chris O’Meara)

Nick Kingham starts for the Pirates on Wednesday against Texas. Mitch Keller pitches, too, but for Indianapolis. With the injuries in the starting rotation — Jameson Taillon and Chris Archer — some think that should be reversed.

We look at Neal Huntington’s explanation as to why the Pirates are keeping Keller down in the minors.

Frankly, the logic is sound. Keller is adding a slider to his arsenal. And it seems to be working. For the season, the 23-year-old has registered a 3.48 ERA. But his last two starts have been good, both victories featuring a 16:1 strikeout-to-walk ratio.

So it appears to be working. And the Pirates don’t want him refining the pitch on the fly at the Major League level.


LISTEN: Why is Mitch Keller still in the minors?

OK. Makes sense. One thing I wonder, though, is that if this was a possibility, why not have Keller implement the pitch in spring training instead of midseason in the minors? That’s especially worthy of asking since a call-up this season has always been projected for Keller.

Also, is that the real reason? Or is this some sort of service time issue or general reluctance to lean on young players, despite how those youthful components of the roster have helped the team this season?

We get into those topics and more in our Wednesday podcast.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.