ShareThis Page
Loss to Syracuse part of Pitt’s growing-up phase |

Loss to Syracuse part of Pitt’s growing-up phase

Jerry DiPaola
| Sunday, January 20, 2019 5:51 p.m
Cody Isern | Pitt Athletics
Pitt’s Trey McGowens moves the ball against Syracuse on Saturday, Jan. 29, 2019.

Growing pains reached up and stung Pitt on Saturday at the Carrier Dome.

Although Pitt trailed by only one point early in the second half, Syracuse led by 20 at one point before finally winning, 74-63.

The Panthers looked befuddled in the face of Syracuse’s 2-3 zone and ended up with 17 turnovers, tied for the most since committing 24 against West Virginia on Dec. 8. Pitt also turned the ball over 17 times Jan. 12 at N.C. State.

“Their zone took us out of any sort of rhythm,” coach Jeff Capel said. “We could never get into a rhythm offensively.”

Here are three observations (not all negative) from the first five ACC games with No. 1 Duke coming to town Tuesday:

1. No happy trails

Pitt’s losing streak in away games is at 17 games, with three of the next four games away from Petersen Events Center. The Panthers haven’t won on an opponent’s floor since Feb. 8, 2017, an 83-72 victory at Boston College.

It’s part of the growing up phase Capel hoped would have passed by now.

In two ACC road games, Pitt is shooting 39.1 percent (47 of 120) with 34 turnovers. In three ACC home games, the shooting is only marginally better (39.6 percent, 67 of 169), but the turnover rate is down from 17 per outing to 13.

2. No trespassing zone

Pitt (12-6, 2-3) is at its best when Xavier Johnson and Trey McGowens can showcase their one-on-one skills against man-to-man defense.

The zone clogs up the lane those two freshmen love to attack and allows two-on-one and three-on-one drives that often don’t end well.

The way to beat the zone is to race down court faster than the defense. But how can that happen when the other team is getting offensive rebounds? Before Pitt held Syracuse to nine (a sign of improvement), ACC opponents were averaging nearly 17 offensive rebounds per game.

Next up is a visit from No. 1 Duke and its man-child freshman, Zion Williamson, who at 6-foot-7, 285 pounds, can take over a game. He is 13th in the nation (second in the ACC) with 3.6 offensive rebounds per game.

The next time Pitt faces a zone defense for 40 minutes, the Panthers need to loosen the noose around their neck by hitting some 3s. Jared Wilson-Frame and Johnson were a combined 8 of 18 from beyond the arc against Syracuse. Another good sign.

3. A little punch in reserve

Before the Syracuse game, Wilson-Frame had been slumping, and his minutes were reduced. But he came off the bench to lead the team with 19 points while grabbing eight rebounds.

Backup point guard Sidy N’Dir, aside from missing all four of his 3-point attempts against the Orange, has been useful since returning from a leg injury. In two games and 21 minutes, he has seven points, four rebounds, four assists and a steal.

The better he plays, the more comfortable Capel will feel resting Johnson and McGowens. Johnson played all 40 minutes at Syracuse.

Get the latest news about Pitt basketball and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.