Majority of readers support Pirates’ plan to extend netting at PNC Park | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Majority of readers support Pirates’ plan to extend netting at PNC Park

Matt Rosenberg
1359820_web1_AP19175061154572
AP
The Pirates are planning to extend the protective netting at PNC Park to the foul poles.

A majority of Tribune-Review readers think the Pittsburgh Pirates’ plan to extend the protective netting to the foul poles at PNC Park will make the environment at the games safer.

But there is a chunk of readers who believe the onus is on fans to pay attention to the action to avoid getting hit by a foul ball.

In a poll of 681 readers generated by CivicScience asking whether they supported the Pirates’ plan to extend the netting to the foul poles, 59% of poll-takers agreed with the decision, saying it will make for a safer environment.

But 27% of readers — 183 of the 681 — do not support the decision, believing fans should be paying more attention to the game.

The plan to extend the netting comes in the aftermath of an injury to a 2-year-old girl, who an attorney last week said suffered a skull fracture and a seizure when she was hit by a foul ball by the Cubs’ Albert Almora Jr. in Houston.

The Chicago White Sox, Washington Nationals and Los Angeles Dodgers are among teams to also have made plans to extend the netting.

Commenters on the Trib’s Facebook page shared their opinions.

Jason Slonceski said he is “Not in favor of it. Pay attention.”

Michael Hoover said it will prevent him from attending games.

“I do not like it and will stop me from going to games,” he wrote. “That being said, the Pirates can do want they think is right.”

Some others believe the extended netting won’t affect the viewing experience.

“All the reasons against it are terrible,” Tim Snyder wrote. “This will not affect your view. This will save lives. How many more need to be severely injured/die for you to think it’s a good idea?”

And, of course, others couldn’t resist the elephant in the room.

”With all the empty seats, the odds of someone getting hit in PNC Park are getting slimmer,” Chuck Davis wrote.

The Pirates are averaging a little over 18,000 fans per home game, ranking 27th in the league ahead of only Baltimore, Tampa Bay and Miami.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.