Marc-Andre Fleury nearly gets into goalie fight | TribLIVE.com
NHL

Marc-Andre Fleury nearly gets into goalie fight

Tim Benz
847273_web1_1134186744
Getty Images
Golden Knights Marc-Andre Fleury lays his stick on the ice after the Calgary Flames fought in the second period of their game March 6, 2019, at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas. The Golden Knights defeated the Flames 2-1.

The “Fleury! Fleury! Fleury!” chants were going strong in Vegas Wednesday night for former Penguins goalie Marc-Andre Fleury.

No, not because of a good save. And, no, he didn’t finally get that empty-net goal he has been endlessly searching to score.

He almost got engaged in a goalie fight!

There was a big scrum on the ice in front of Fleury’s crease when the Golden Knights were playing the Flames on Wednesday. It all started when Calgary’s Matthew Tkachuk knocked Fleury to the ice.

Golden Knight’s defenseman Colin Miller jumped in. And Fleury stood up for himself a bit, too, after Tkachuk went at him directly.

When all the skaters got engaged with each other, opposing goalie David Rittich skated out to the Calgary blue line to see if Fleury wanted to fight.

And Fleury’s response was, well, classic Flower.

As we all know, the awkward goalie stick drop is the international sign that goalie violence is about to occur.

But cooler heads prevailed.

Sadly.


Here was Fleury’s explanation after the game.

If Fleury ever does get into a goalie fight, let’s hope he remember some tips from Brent Johnson.

Fleury had the last laugh in the box score, too. The Golden Knights beat the Flames, 2-1, behind Fleury’s 33 saves.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.