ShareThis Page
Mark Madden: Any rule that shortens MLB games is good rule |
Mark Madden, Columnist

Mark Madden: Any rule that shortens MLB games is good rule

Mark Madden
| Monday, February 11, 2019 6:34 p.m
Mark Madden writes a three-batter minimum for each pitcher, further limiting mound visits and a 20-second pitch clock with the bases empty are worthwhile MLB adjustments.

The National League will not use the DH until at least 2022, according to reports. That’s quite understandable. What’s the hurry? The National and American leagues have illogically differed in this regard since 1973. What’s three more years?

Those three years, of course, will be filled with the merciless kvetching of the baseball media’s grand old guardians of the game. They refuse to die, or shut up.

You can imagine veins popping on their heads when they talk, write or tweet about the DH. Prime examples are ESPN’s Keith Olbermann, MLB Network’s Bob Costas, MLB Network’s Brian Kenny and Pirates announcer Greg Brown.

Each acts as if universal use of the DH would make Abner Doubleday spin in his grave because his invention got so badly bastardized. (If Doubleday does, indeed, maintain view of this mortal coil, he became ashamed of baseball long ago.)

I’m apathetic about the DH because I’m mostly apathetic about baseball. It means another bad hitter in the Pirates lineup, another good hitter for most other teams. I’d prefer each team use a batting order of all 25 rostered players, like in tee-ball.

But I do like to see the “experts” fight.

These same media wretches won’t vote the steroid guys into the Hall of Fame because they sullied baseball’s integrity, but ignored obvious signs of PED use in 1998 when assorted pharmacists conspired with bat-wielding lab rats to save baseball in the wake of’ ’94’s strike. Nobility had to wait, but it’s since been brandished like a club.

Imagine if Barry Bonds came back to DH in the National League. You could see heads explode. Bonds’ might merely get bigger (again). Hey, it worked once.

Anti-DH forces decry the elimination of managerial strategy. The bunt and two-for-one switch are minimized.

But when I go to a Pirates game, it’s not to see Clint Hurdle’s, uh, managerial wizardry. (It was hard typing that with a straight face.) I want to see somebody hit a home run. Baseball should be designed for the common fan, not disciples of sabermetrics. (Those nerds, BTW, should lobby for lineups in strict descending order of OPS. That, and only that, would fully harvest metrics. Why doesn’t a bad team try that? Hey, Clint…)

Then again, the Pirates only hit 157 home runs last year, the sixth-lowest total in MLB. Perhaps they should bunt more. (Except analytics say bunting is stupid. Brad Pitt said so in “Moneyball.” That’s how most baseball fans learned analytics: from Brad Pitt.)

I went to one Pirates game last year. Neither manager made a two-for-one switch, so I didn’t go back. No hit-and-runs, either. I nearly rioted. (Does anyone watch MLB to see strategy play out? Are you that geeky? Save that for APBA, or Strat-O-Matic.)

My method of consuming MLB is to watch the last 3-4 innings of a close game on TV, preferably sandwiched by “That ’70s Show” re-runs. (Part of what made the gang so cool was that they never watched or played baseball.) Even my Reader’s Digest version of baseball becomes numbing if there’s too many pitching changes.

So, turning semi-serious for a second, I’m for anything that shortens games.

Many fans love that baseball has no clock, and games are played at a leisurely pace. I understand, but that’s what doesn’t interest me.

I’m a soccer addict for many reasons, but it’s a major plus that every Premier League game lasts under two hours, and the action is nonstop. In 2018, the average MLB game took over three hours to play. Not enough of that time is spent with the ball in play.

It’s senseless for the two leagues to have any different rules, but what’s decided about the DH doesn’t concern me. But a three-batter minimum for each pitcher, further limiting mound visits and a 20-second pitch clock with the bases empty all strike me as adjustments that can shave time. So I vote yes.

I do hope the National League uses the DH, just to see Brown’s reaction.

Here’s an excerpt from one of Brown’s recent tweets about the universal DH: “Must fight this with all our might…for the good of this great game!”

Bro, it’s a rule in a sport, not the spread of Communism throughout Southeast Asia. (That couldn’t be stopped, either.)

Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM 105.9.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.