ShareThis Page
Mark Madden: Antonio Brown stands for nothing but himself | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Mark Madden: Antonio Brown stands for nothing but himself

Mark Madden
| Monday, March 11, 2019 7:45 p.m.

“And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter.”

— “Stairway to Heaven,” Led Zeppelin (“Heaven,” not “seven.” That stairway collapsed.)

Does anybody remember laughter?

It’s been a while where the Pittsburgh Steelers are concerned. The franchise has been buried too long under the avalanche of abject selfishness and methodical turmoil inflicted by The Toxic Twins, Le’Veon Bell and Antonio Brown. They are your overlords.

Some see the departure of The Toxic Twins as disaster. That’s understandable if you’re bound and determined to puke up fantasy stats ad nauseam.

But I told you years ago that the Steelers had zero chance to win with The Toxic Twins. At era’s end, I’m right. Like always. #SaveUs166

Blame Ben Roethlisberger if you like. But he has two rings. Roethlisberger knows how.

The Toxic Twins don’t, nor did they ever want to learn.

A new breed exists: athletes who aren’t at all concerned with winning. Money comes first, ego gratification second and anything else a distant third.

The Steelers never came close to winning with The Toxic Twins. Their “finest hour” was a 19-point loss to New England in the 2016 season’s AFC final, a game Bell tanked with a minor injury to protect his upcoming free agency,which didn’t arrive for two more years thanks to the magic of the franchise tag.

Brown, in that same game, went ballistic on the sideline after DeAngelo Williams (and not Brown) scored the Steelers’ first touchdown. Trailing 10-6, Roethlisberger and other teammates had to talk Brown off the ledge.

The Toxic Twins are gone, and good riddance.

Do the Steelers have a chance to win next season’s Super Bowl? Probably not.

Do they have a chance to win the AFC North? Borderline.

But the Steelers finally have a chance to be likeable again. A new day has dawned.

That’s unless all this stupidity happens again with different players. Art Rooney is still the owner. Mike Tomlin is still the coach. Laissez-faire means more of the same.

What can be done to seize control?

I’d start by cutting linebacker Bud Dupree.

Dupree has been openly supportive of Brown’s social media shenanigans, has underachieved for all four of his seasons and is due $9.2 million this year. Shoot a hostage. Release Dupree.

After Dupree gets his walking papers, tell JuJu Smith-Schuster he shouldn’t share every waking moment on social media. If Smith-Schuster wants to be a No. 1 receiver, he should do what the last No. 1 receiver didn’t: specifically, behave like a grown man. Dance a little less, adult a little more.

If you don’t see Smith-Schuster as potentially headed down the same path as Brown, you just don’t want to. The seed is planted.

Can Tomlin repair the situation? It’s doubtful. The enabler can’t suddenly become the fixer.

Will Brown’s departure provide a remedy? Perhaps. But that seems too simple.

Recaps of Brown’s time with the Steelers are being written and spoken all over this great nation. His ennobling nauseates.

Brown isn’t Curt Flood, Cesar Chavez or Norma Rae. He isn’t a “little guy” who bravely and smartly found a way to beat the system.

Brown is a jerk who stomped, yelled and held his breath like a 9-year-old until he got his way. He’s a multimillionaire who always wants more.

Aaron Donald held out in Los Angeles until the Rams paid him. Khalil Mack finagled his way from Oakland to Chicago. Each did so quietly and with a modicum of dignity. Bell’s protracted exit from Pittsburgh looks palatable next to Brown’s departure.

(BTW, why would the Raiders pay Brown $19.8 million per season but balk at paying Mack, who’s averaging $23.5 million per with the Bears? Even at the difference in price, the best pass rusher is much more valuable than the best receiver. Mack is 28, Brown 30.)

It will go bad in Oakland.

When Jon Gruden coached Tampa Bay, he and diva receiver Keyshawn Johnson had a huge blowup. Quarterback Derek Carr occasionally cries, perhaps because he can’t throw downfield. The Raiders will stink. Brown’s numbers will dip.

Time heals all wounds.

In this case, it shouldn’t.

The Steelers never should invite Brown back. Not to induct him into their Hall of Honor, not for any reunions, not under any circumstances. Brown intentionally embarrassed the team and maliciously drove down his trade value.

Hall of Honor? Brown has no honor.

Former and current players who salute Brown for his escape should be ashamed. Remember Week 17? Remember how Brown skipped out on his teammates when the Steelers had a chance to make the playoffs?

Those praising Brown must not remember that. Brown’s betrayal of what a football player should most hold sacred obscured anything he did, before or since, that could be deemed a righteous pursuit. Brown quit. Brown stands for nothing but himself.

Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM 105.9.


865464_web1_AP_18358013494766
AP
Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown carries ahead of defensive end Marcus Davenport in the second Dec. 23, 2018, in New Orleans, La.
865464_web1_BellBrownSteelers
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back LeVeon Bell celebrates with receiver Antonio Brown after Brown’s touchdown against the Bengals in the first quarter Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017 at Heinz Field.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.