Mark Madden: Penguins helping ensure Blue Jackets lose ‘all-in’ bet |

Mark Madden: Penguins helping ensure Blue Jackets lose ‘all-in’ bet

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Patric Hornqvist takes out the Blue Jackets’ Zach Wernski in the third period Thursday, March 7, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

As the NHL’s Feb. 25 trade deadline beckoned, Columbus was half-expected to trade goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky and winger Artemi Panarin, each in the final season of his contract. A rebuilding of sorts seemed likely.

But there were no obvious suitors for Bobrovsky. The legit Stanley Cup contenders all have legit goalies.

So the Blue Jackets went in the opposite direction. They acquired forwards Matt Duchene and Ryan Dzingel, defenseman Adam McQuaid and goalie Keith Kinkaid, all rentals. The Blue Jackets went “all in.”

But the question begs: “All in” for what? What can realistically be achieved?

Columbus, even after those additions, is no better than a marginal playoff team — as evidenced by the Jackets’ presence in the margin of the Eastern Conference postseason talk. They were two points out of a wild-card spot before last night’s action. They are 2-4 since the trade deadline.

It’s also evidenced by losing eight straight regular-season games to the Penguins. (The Penguins also won a playoff series vs. Columbus, four games to one, within that timeline.)

It’s an age of parity. The NHL uses a salary cap.

How do the Penguins win eight in a row against a team that made the playoffs in each of the last two seasons and trails them by a mere four points now?

It’s a question the Penguins coaches and players hesitate to answer. The teams play again tonight at Columbus, after all.

“I’m not sure there’s a valid explanation,” coach Mike Sullivan said after the host Penguins topped Columbus, 3-0, on Thursday.

“Every game we play them is a hard-fought battle, and the margin for error is slim. Most of the games are close. They’re a real good team. Fortunately, we’re finding ways to win. But I don’t think there’s a real valid answer.”

Penguins defenseman Jack Johnson played for Columbus from 2012-18. He was on the losing side in the first five games of the current streak, and in the aforementioned playoff series.

Johnson seemed uncomfortable discussing the Penguins-Blue Jackets dynamic.

“I don’t know if I have a good answer for you,” Johnson said Thursday. “We played well tonight.”

Do the Penguins have a lot of confidence playing Columbus?

Johnson: “We have a lot of confidence playing anybody.”

Spoken like a 13-year NHL vet and a veteran of many interviews, too.

If there’s any reason for the Penguins’ subjugation of the Blue Jackets, it might be their pronounced edge at center, which Columbus alleviated only slightly by getting Duchene. But Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin dominate a lot of teams.

It might also be Bobrovsky’s failure against the Penguins, which was doubtless a factor in Columbus starting backup Joonas Korpisalo on Thursday.

Bobrovsky has zero wins and five losses with a 3.87 goals-against average and a .882 save percentage against the Penguins dating through last season. Not good. His numbers were nearly identical in the 2017 playoff series loss to the Penguins: 1-4, 3.88 goals-against average, .882 save percentage.

If the Penguins aren’t in Bobrovsky’s head, they are certainly in his net.

If the Blue Jackets can’t find a way to end the streak and win Saturday, they might board that train to Palookaville less than two weeks after going “all in.”

In the era of tanking — pioneered in this zip code in 1984 — Columbus general manager Jarmo Keikalainen has been commended for going for it.

The motivation might have been on a lower plane than winning a Stanley Cup.

The Blue Jackets are the only NHL team to never have won a playoff series. If that embarrassment hasn’t created an air of desperation in the organization, it should.

It’s no surprise Kekalainen’s effort is failing. He acquired Duchene, Dzingel, Kinkaid and McQuaid, not Giordano, Kucherov, McDavid and Price. Having a lot of one-foot-out-the-door guys probably lessens the locker room’s investment.

Columbus didn’t play terribly Thursday. They killed a five-on-three for 1:55 early in the third period, then used the momentum created to generate lots of pressure and a few excellent chances only to be stymied by Penguins goaltender Matt Murray, who made 25 saves to post the shutout.

In the end, Columbus lost to the Penguins.

It’s what Columbus does.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.