Mark Madden: Steelers-Browns example of hope vs. hype | TribLIVE.com
Mark Madden, Columnist

Mark Madden: Steelers-Browns example of hope vs. hype

Mark Madden
1431233_web1_gtr-steelers20-102918
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker T.J. Watt sacks Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield in the third quarter Sunday, Oct. 28, 2018, at Heinz Field.
1431233_web1_gtr-mayfield-072019
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker T.J. Watt pressures Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield on Sunday, Oct. 28, 2018, at Heinz Field.

With NFL training camps fast approaching, the AFC North’s main rivalry is abundantly clear.

It’s hope vs. hype.

The Steelers hope rookie inside linebacker Devin Bush fills the hole left by Ryan Shazier when he got hurt 20 months ago. The Steelers hope losing Antonio Brown’s noise helps more than losing Brown’s talent hurts.

The Cleveland Browns, meantime, are bolstered by hype worthy of the Backstreet Boys in the ’90s. It is gratuitous. It is loud. It is nonstop, and it is annoying.

It’s fortunate in one regard: With Baltimore fading (maybe) and Cincinnati continuing to be Cincinnati, hope vs. hype jump-starts a rivalry that has been mostly dormant (and certainly lopsided) since the Browns re-entered the NFL in 1999.

The Steelers are 34-6-1 against the Browns since ’99.

Ben Roethlisberger has 11 wins at Cleveland’s FirstEnergy Stadium. That’s more victories than any quarterback in that facility’s history. The Browns have started 30 quarterbacks since ’99.

That history is apparently irrelevant since Odell Beckham Jr. migrated from New Jersey to Cleveland and because quarterback Baker Mayfield (aka Johnny Manziel Jr.) had a decent rookie year for Cleveland.

Sports Illustrated’s MMQB website thinks so, anyway.

Peep this headline: “Two years removed from 0-16, these Browns have no major weaknesses.”

Sure they do. They’re the Browns.

If you want to go beyond that, the Browns have a first-year head coach, a second-year quarterback, a difficult nondivision schedule and a defense that ranked third-worst in the NFL last season (but did lead the AFC in takeaways).

BTW, in that same article, it’s said left tackle Greg Robinson is a “weak link.” The author and headline writer really need to be on the same page.

Cleveland was 7-8-1 last year, 0-16 the year before.

To predict the Browns will take another significant jump up the ladder seems a media creation.

So does the MVP candidacy of Mayfield.

The QB has a booster in O.J. Simpson, who went on Twitter and touted Mayfield as a potential No. 1 pick in fantasy football. Over to you, Norm Macdonald.

Mayfield did OK as a rookie: 3,725 passing yards, 27 touchdowns, 14 interceptions and a QB rating of 93.7.

Last season, Roethlisberger had 5,129 passing yards, 34 touchdowns, 16 interceptions and a QB rating of 96.5.

Mayfield threw 10 TDs and 11 picks against foes with winning records. Roethlisberger threw 13 TDs and four picks.

But Mayfield is the MVP candidate, not Roethlisberger.

Mayfield is 11-1 to win MVP. Roethlisberger is 40-1.

MVP? SMH.

The Browns are headed in the right direction. (They couldn’t help but.)

Mayfield is going to be better than Manziel (duh), and probably pretty good.

But being force-fed all this Browns hype is more than a bit nauseating. But hype doesn’t have to be delivered in a logical and timely fashion. In fact, it often works better when it isn’t.

Vegas has the Steelers’ over/under at 9.5 wins. Cleveland’s is 9.

Yet the national football media has the Steelers painted as underdogs in the AFC North.

That’s OK. It’s fun to see the Steelers pictured as laying in the weeds. It’s a change. The pressure is on the Browns.

ESPN’s nonstop, all-day barrage of debate often discusses the Steelers. Roethlisberger must be gaining stature in the Worldwide Leader’s eyes because they’ve gone from eviscerating him to ignoring him.

When Brown got traded to Oakland, the preceding turmoil was all Roethlisberger’s fault.

Now, looking forward, there’s no way the Steelers offense can recover from losing Brown.

One ESPN coffee klatch mostly ignored Roethlisberger while discussing the Steelers on that side of the ball. It’s like Roethlisberger is a bystander.

But Roethlisberger made Brown. Just like he made Mike Wallace and Santonio Holmes, who both disappeared upon departure.

Roethlisberger is what counts most with the Steelers offense, and he always has been.

That’s why the Steelers will win the AFC North.

Colin Cowherd has been getting it right all along. See? Fox really is fair and balanced.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.