Mike Tomlin clarifies Steelers injuries, why Devin Bush didn’t play | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Mike Tomlin clarifies Steelers injuries, why Devin Bush didn’t play

Chris Adamski
1557185_web1_gtr-steelers04-081119
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker Devin Bush reacts to a near pick six in a preseason game against Tampa Bay on Aug. 9. He was held out of Saturday’s preseason game by Mike Tomlin as “a precaution” because of a shoulder injury.

For the most part, as Mike Tomlin likes to say, they were “minor bumps and bruises.” But Tomlin did at least begin to provide some clarity on some of the injuries affecting the Pittsburgh Steelers both before and during Saturday’s preseason game.

Most notably, Tomlin gave the reason why Devin Bush did not play against the Kansas City Chiefs: Bush has a shoulder injury. Bush, the linebacker drafted with the 10th overall pick, missed practice time earlier in the week at Saint Vincent.

Bush did, though, participate in the most recent practice Thursday. And he was in uniform Saturday and took part in warm-ups at Heinz Field.

Tomlin termed keeping Bush out of Saturday’s game “a precaution.”

Tomlin was not as forthcoming about another rookie taken in the fifth round. Asked about tight end Zach Gentry, Tomlin responded: “He is out with injury.”

Tomlin listed two players who left Saturday’s 17-7 win because of injury: linebacker Anthony Chickillo (“a chest injury of some description”) and running back Benny Snell (groin).

“None of that appears to be serious at this juncture,” Tomlin said.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.