Mike Tomlin: Seeking more speed ‘a factor’ but not ‘the factor’ for Steelers | TribLIVE.com

Mike Tomlin: Seeking more speed ‘a factor’ but not ‘the factor’ for Steelers

Chris Adamski
Steelers first-round pick Devin Bush goes through drills during rookie mini camp Friday, May 10, 2019 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Judging by how they spent their picks on defensive players during the draft last month, it would be reasonable to assume the Pittsburgh Steelers have put a premium on adding speed to their defense.

Coach Mike Tomlin wouldn’t go that far, at least not explicitly.

“A factor, not the determining factor,” Tomlin said at the end of the second day of rookie mini-camp at the UPMC Rooney Sports Complex on Saturday. “Speed’s always going to be an element to this thing, relative to positions.”

Devin Bush, who the Steelers traded up for in the first-round, ran the second-fastest 40-yard dash time of any linebacker at the combine (4.43 seconds). Sixth-round linebacker Ulysses Gilbert reportedly ran in the 4.5 range at his Pro Day for the University of Akron. Third-rounder Justin Layne also was in the top half of cornerback 40 runners at the combine.

Since Ryan Shazier’s injury in December 2017, the Steelers dropped dramatically in regards to their relative speed compared to other NFL teams.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.