Missouri Tigers’ postgame interview antics are next level | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Missouri Tigers’ postgame interview antics are next level

Samson X Horne
1115088_web1_Mizzou
In this Nov. 2, 2013 photo, the Mizzou logo is seen on a scoreboard over Memorial Stadium at Faurot Field before the start of an NCAA college football game between Missouri and Tennessee in Columbia, Mo. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

We’ve seen the occasional pie in the face, and who can forget James Harden’s eye-roll and slide away from the mic?

Chris Bosh, LeBron James and Dwayne Wade used to photo (video) bomb each other and try to make one another laugh during their teammate’s time with reporters after victories.

Well, all that may have been trumped last weekend by the University of Missouri Tigers baseball team.

ESPN sure didn’t mind highlighting the shenanigans.

Apparently, while their coach has the headset and is mic’d up to talk with analysts in the booth, they’ve found time to knight a fellow teammate “Game of Thrones” style. Also, while one of the team’s pitchers is speaking with analysts, his buddies perform two mini-rounds of boxing complete with a TKO and “ref” who declares victory by means of a pro wrestling-style 3-count.

Oh — and they had the props including: a sword (baseball bat), boxing gloves, poster for the “ring model” and mouth guards.

That uppercut was nasty!

If you’re wondering, the team pulled the stunts after a 5-2 victory over South Carolina and an 11-0 beatdown against those same Gamecocks the next day.

The Tigers have a 31-15-1 record and are riding the wave of a five-game winning streak.

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.