MLB Network spotlights Pirates as force to be reckoned with in NL Central |

MLB Network spotlights Pirates as force to be reckoned with in NL Central

Matt Rosenberg
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates first baseman Josh Bell gets a curtain call after hitting his third home run of the night against the Cubs Monday, July 1, 2019, at PNC Park.

“Let’s get on the Pirate ship” indeed.

MLB Network’s Mark DeRosa seems to be pretty confident in the Pittsburgh Pirates.

In a segment that aired Friday morning on the network’s morning show, “MLB Central,” the former journeyman utility player outlined all of the reasons the Pirates should be able to take control of the National League Central.

Entering Friday’s games, the Pirates were three games behind the Chicago Cubs for first place in the division after winning three of four against them this week.

DeRosa opened with the obvious: All-Star Josh Bell captaining the ship. Bell leads MLB in RBIs (81) and extra-base hits (57).

But, as DeRosa pointed out, Starling Marte, the longest-tenured Pirate, is doing his job as Bell’s “first mate.” Marte has 12 home runs, 13 stolen bases and 40 RBIs.

DeRosa also spotlighted young-guns Bryan Reynolds and Kevin Newman and their breakout seasons.

He also addressed rumors surrounding a potential trade of closer Felipe Vazquez, seeming to implore the Pirates to hang onto him as the division race progresses.

“The time is now,” DeRosa says at the end of the segment.

Watch the full piece below.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.