ShareThis Page
Muted Penguins offense facing now-or-never Game 4 with Islanders | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Muted Penguins offense facing now-or-never Game 4 with Islanders

Chris Adamski
1026507_web1_gtr-pens15-041519
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Islanders goaltender Robin Lehner makes a save on the Penguins’ Sidney Crosby in the third period Sunday, April 14, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
1026507_web1_AP_19104707299061
AP
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Bryan Rust (17) and New York Islanders’ Johnny Boychuk (55) collide in the goal crease in front of goaltender Robin Lehner during the third period in Game 3 of an NHL first-round hockey playoff series in Pittsburgh, Sunday, April 14, 2019. The Islanders won 4-1. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
1026507_web1_AP_19104735317371
AP
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Sidney Crosby (87) holds off New York Islanders’ Devon Toews (25) during a second period power play in Game 3 of an NHL first-round hockey playoff series in Pittsburgh, Sunday, April 14, 2019. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
1026507_web1_1141794166
Getty Images
UNIONDALE, NEW YORK - APRIL 10: Sidney Crosby #87 of the Pittsburgh Penguins skates in on Robin Lehner #40 of the New York Islanders during the first period in Game One of the Eastern Conference First Round during the 2019 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at NYCB Live’s Nassau Coliseum on April 10, 2019 in Uniondale, New York. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

In explaining the Pittsburgh Penguins impotent offensive production, it’s easy to point to the New York Islanders and the Penguins’ obvious troubles in solving their first-round opponent’s commitment to defense.

But in reality, the Penguins’ struggles with scoring goals extend well back beyond the start of the postseason. Though winning masked the problem, the Penguins scored just 25 goals over the final 11 games of the regular season; in their final six games against playoff teams, they scored just 11 goals (1.83 per game).

In that context, producing five goals over the first three games (1.67 per game) of the series against the Islanders is largely just more of the same. In 14 games since March 16, the Penguins are averaging 2.14 goals per game — 1.78 against playoff teams.

All that matters now if the Penguins are going to extend their season is scoring enough in Game 4 on Tuesday night at PPG Paints Arena. That proved difficult to the Penguins during the first three games of the series, all losses.

“The challenge is the Islanders — that’s part of their gameplan — they have numbers back,” Penguins coach Mike Sullivan said. “We knew that going in. They were the No. 1 team in the league in the least amount of odd-man rushes against in the regular season. I think there’s a direct correlation there to keeping your goals-against down. Some of the better-quality chances that occur in the game occur off the rush.

“We have to be able to create offense different ways. That’s been the challenge. That will continue to be the challenge moving forward.”

Of the Penguins’ five goals in the series, three were generated by shots from defensemen from the point — off the sticks of Justin Schultz (Game 1) and Erik Gudbranson (Game 2) and one that was deflected by Garrett Wilson after a shot from Marcus Pettersson. Another (Evgeni Malkin in Game 1) came on the power play.

That leaves just one goal that came from a forward during any sort of traditional offensive flow. Just three Penguins goals over the first three games of the series came at 5-on-5.

“We knew going into this series that they were going to be low-scoring games,” Sullivan said. “You look at the way the games have been played, there’s been a real fine line between winning and losing in all the games. There are areas of our game where we know we can be better that give us a better chance to win.”

So, what are those targeted areas for improvement? Sullivan played coy, allowing only that they studied them on film Monday during a session at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex after on-ice practice was canceled.

The only hints dropped from a small group of players who were available to the media indicated not a tactical strategy but a more pragmatic (if less controllable) one.

“It starts with playing with the lead,” defenseman Brian Dumoulin said. “If we do that and throughout the game if we can carry a lead, I think that will definitely benefit us.”

The Penguins have held a lead for 3 minutes and 17 seconds among the 184-plus minutes of action in the series.

Under coach Barry Trotz, New York is constructed not as a team intended to erase deficits but one that can more effectively choke down on an opponent that’s behind. The Penguins have a belief if they can turn the tables and get a lead, that will snowball to their advantage in regards to style of play.

“We can look at every game and say that there’s different points where if we would have scored on a certain play maybe that opens things up and they’re not defending quite as hard and they open it up and we get another one,” Crosby said. “Things can change pretty quickly, and for that reason, that’s why we believe that if we come in with the right mindset (Tuesday) we can get it done.”

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.