ShareThis Page
Nation, World Sports

Jordan Speith relaxes as he chases historic Grand Slam

| Wednesday, Aug. 9, 2017, 6:34 p.m.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Jordan Spieth already has shown a remarkable sense of the moment.

He earned his PGA Tour card by holing a bunker shot on the 18th hole and winning a playoff. In the final round before the Presidents Cup selections, he shot 62 while playing with Phil Mickelson, who told U.S. captain Fred Couples, “Dude, you've got to pick this guy.” And right when it looked as though Spieth might throw away another major, he nearly made an ace and followed that with an eagle on his way to winning the British Open.

That was his third major, and it brought Spieth, newly 24, to the grandest moment of all.

No one has won the career Grand Slam at a younger age. No one has completed it at the PGA Championship.

Spieth never has appeared more relaxed.

“There will be pressure,” he said. “This is a major championship. This is one of the four pivotal weeks of the year that we focus on. So there will certainly be pressure. I'm simply stating there won't be added expectations or pressure. It's not a burning desire to have to be the youngest to do something, and that would be the only reason there would be added expectations.”

Spieth doesn't see his greatest challenge as the history at stake. He considers it the Quail Hollow Club course that he has played only one time and the strongest field in golf that features a few major champions who are desperate to make sure the year doesn't end without them adding another major.

Rory McIlroy comes to mind.

So do Dustin Johnson and Jason Day.

McIlroy is a slight favorite, mainly because he has won two times at Quail Hollow — one year with a 62, the other with a 61 — and has finished out of the top 10 just one time in his seven appearances.

“If you're matched up on Sunday ... you obviously want to be able to play against somebody like Rory who has four major championships and is one of the top couple most accomplished players in this field,” Spieth said. “But he is one to fear in that position because of what he's capable of doing and how he's going to do it.”

Fear is not a word Spieth uses often.

This week at the PGA Championship is more about being free from the burden of trying to win a major this year. He said he hasn't felt this way since the 2015 U.S. Open at Chambers Bay, right after he won the Masters for his first major.

“Almost like I've accomplished something so great this year that anything else that happens, I can accept,” he said. “That takes that pressure, that expectation, away.”

After winning at Chambers Bay to get halfway to the calendar Grand Slam, he felt slightly different at the British Open. There was added pressure — if only slightly — and more expectations when he considered the prospect of winning them all in the same year. Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods never got that far.

Neither did Spieth. He missed a playoff by one shot.

But there was a moment he recalled that illustrates what it means to play freely.

He holed a 50-foot birdie putt to tie for the lead with two holes to go at St. Andrews. Instead of hitting his tee shot over the Old Course Hotel to have the best angle into the 17th green, he played down the left side — the safe side. The Road Hole Bunker in his way, he missed the green to the right and then missed a 5-foot par putt. A par on the final hole ended his dream of the Grand Slam.

Looking back, Spieth said he should have gone down the right side of the 17th hole.

“One of the bigger regrets that I've had in golf,” Spieth said. “If I don't pull off the shot, I hit it out of bounds, big whoop. But I didn't. I went down the left side that day. It was playing extremely tough. I didn't reach the green.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me