ShareThis Page
Nation, World Sports

Derby champ Justify is early Preakness favorite, but he's far from sure thing

| Saturday, May 12, 2018, 7:12 p.m.
LOUISVILLE, KY - MAY 05:  Justify #7, ridden by jockey Mike Smith crosses the finish line to win the 144th running of the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs on May 5, 2018 in Louisville, Kentucky.  (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)
Getty Images
LOUISVILLE, KY - MAY 05: Justify #7, ridden by jockey Mike Smith crosses the finish line to win the 144th running of the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs on May 5, 2018 in Louisville, Kentucky. (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)

BALTIMORE — The Preakness, the second leg of horse racing's Triple Crown, is historically a less crowded affair, with fewer horses in the field and more money focused on the favorites.

Three years ago, after a win in the Kentucky Derby, American Pharoah got 9-10 odds at the Preakness' post time. Affirmed, another Triple Crown winner, was a 1-2 favorite in 1978. Secretariat won gamblers just 30 cents for every final dollar bet at Pimlico Race Course in 1973.

Of course, so would have a bay stallion named Riva Ridge the year before. As a 2-year-old, Riva Ridge won an Eclipse Award. In 1972 came a wire-to-wire, 11-length victory in the Derby as the favorite. Two weeks later, heavy rains fell overnight in Baltimore, and Riva Ridge didn't much like the mud. He finished fourth in a seven-horse Preakness field. An easy win in the Belmont Stakes only added to his mystique.

History has always preceded the arrival of the reigning Derby champion in Maryland, a well-worn reminder there is no such thing as a sure thing. Justify is this year's early Preakness favorite, undefeated in four races, the last a convincing win May 5 at Churchill Downs. But there are hard truths for those seeking (and seeing) easy money.

“Yes, (the field) can beat him,” said Hall of Fame trainer D. Wayne Lukas, who has two Preakness entrants. “But it's going to be very difficult. But you have to look back down the years. Who would have thought Barbaro would have got beat? Who would have thought Fusaichi Pegasus would have got beat? ... It's (Justify's) race to lose. But you can't mail it in.”

Since 2005, every Derby winner but two has entered the Preakness' post time as the favorite. The only exceptions: Mine That Bird (6.6-1 odds), the eventual runner-up in 2009 to favorite Rachel Alexandra, and I'll Have Another (3.2-1), who topped Bodemeister in 2012.

Altogether, Derby winners over the past 20 years have fared well in the Triple Crown's shortest race. Eight have won a second consecutive trophy, four have placed second and two have finished third.

“When you feel like you really have the horse, you just don't want to mess it up, because you don't know if you'll ever be back again,” Justify trainer Bob Baffert said Thursday.

This will be the hall of famer's fifth Preakness with a Derby winner. The previous four — Silver Charm, Real Quiet, War Emblem and American Pharoah — all left Pimlico with a shot at the Triple Crown.

Lukas has trained four Derby winners and five Preakness champions himself. But only one, 1999 Horse of the Year Charismatic, won both legs. He knows that, above all, a horse must be tough or that two-week turnaround is liable to “jump up and bite you,” he said.

“You can't have one of these what I call ‘soft horses,' ” he said. “When you come out of the Derby, you've got to have a blue-collar, tough horse.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me