ShareThis Page
Nation, World Sports

New Castle's Evan Long, Stephen Cerbara earn U.S. Open sectional berths

Paul Schofield
| Wednesday, May 16, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

When Stephen Cerbara lined up his 12-foot putt on No. 18 at Quicksilver Golf Club on Wednesday, he had no idea where he stood on the leaderboard.

His aunt, Angela Repka of Belle Vernon, did, and she gave him a look that he needed to make the putt.

Cerbara sank the birdie putt, gave a fist pump and secured a spot in the U.S. Open Sectional on June 4. There, he hopes to qualify for the U.S. Open at Shinnecock Hills, N.Y., on June 14-17.

Cerbara, from Langhorne near Philadelphia, and New Castle's Evan Long (Laurel) each shot 4-under-par 67 to earn the two berths to the next round. Cerbara's clutch putt kind of ruined Central Catholic junior Neal Shipley's day.

Shipley posted an early 3-under 68 earlier in the day and sat nervously in the clubhouse waiting for the final few golfers to post a score. Shipley, a Mt. Lebanon resident, settled for the first alternate spot and Wexford's David Lutterus earned the second alternate after finishing with a 1-under 70. Zach Ford of Cochranton also shot a 70, but he did not stick around for the playoff.

“I'm happy I picked here,” said Cerbara, a future Drexel player. “I got to visit family and when I looked online the course looked in good shape and well kept.”

Cerbara, 19, had three birdies (Nos. 3, 5 and 8) on the front nine to go along with a couple good saves, and two birdies (Nos. 15 and 18) on the back. His lone bogey was No. 11.

“I hit it close, and I putted well,” Cerbara said.

This was his fifth attempt in a U.S. Open local qualifier and first time he advanced.

Long, a freshman at Minnesota, said he was looking to have fun with his dad (Ed) as his caddie.

“I played well and had fun,” Long said. “It helped me get going because everyone in the group played well.”

Long, 19, was a three-time PIAA and WPIAL placewinner.

He had six birdies (Nos. 4, 7, 9, 10, 15 and 16) and two bogeys (Nos. 3 and 18).

Shipley, who missed an AP Statistical final, paced and watched the golfers play No. 18. He was hoping his 68 would hold up.

“I tried to qualify last year, and I didn't have a good day,” Shipley said. “I shot an 80 and then was disqualified because I signed an incorrect scorecard. I haven't done that again. It was a good learning experience.”

Shipley, 17, had four birdies (Nos. 1, 9, 14 and 15). He bogeyed No. 10.

“This was a good experience,” Shipley said. “I wanted to go out and post a good score early.”

Unfortunately for Shipley, Cerbara made a clutch putt in the final group.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me