ShareThis Page
Nation, World Sports

Coaches push for changes to targeting rules, kickoffs and eliminating Friday night games

| Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2019, 5:39 p.m.
Cincinnati cornerback Tyrell Gilbert, left, collides with Virginia Tech wide receiver Tre Turner as Turner rushes the ball in the second half of the Military Bowl, Monday, Dec. 31, 2018, in Annapolis, Md. Gilbert was ejected from the game for targeting Turner on the play.
Cincinnati cornerback Tyrell Gilbert, left, collides with Virginia Tech wide receiver Tre Turner as Turner rushes the ball in the second half of the Military Bowl, Monday, Dec. 31, 2018, in Annapolis, Md. Gilbert was ejected from the game for targeting Turner on the play.

Looking to provide some clarification for the sometimes ambiguous targeting rule, coaches taking part in the annual American Football Coaches Association Convention this week have put forth a proposal that would create a two-fold penalty.

The concept put forth by the group, which consists of college football coaches from every division, would create a Targeting 1 and Targeting 2 penalty.

“All of our coaches are in favor of the targeting rule and they recognize the significance of it. We also recognize that there needs to be more clarification,” AFCA Executive Director Todd Berry said in a statement. “There is going to be subjectivity in the enforcement of this rule, but this can be very costly to the student-athlete who has limited attempts to play this game.

“For a student-athlete to be ejected from a game for something that many would question to be the correct call can be severe.”

Targeting 1 would be called if there is no malicious intent by the player. It would come with a simple 15-yard penalty.

Targeting 2 would be called if there is malicious intent by the player. The proposal would call for a more severe punishment than a one-game suspension if the player has been flagged for multiple Target 2 penalties.

Targeting is when a player makes forcible contact against a defenseless opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. It’s also defined by the NCAA when a player makes forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder.

Players are automatically disqualified for targeting. If a player is ejected in the first half, they must miss the remainder of the game. If a player is ejected in the second half, he must miss the first half of the team’s next game.

Any changes would have to go through the NCAA Football Oversight Committee.

•••••••

The coaches also discussed changes to the kickoff.

The NCAA instituted a new rule in 2018 that allows teams to call for a fair catch that would place the football on their own 25-yard line. According to AFCA, the number of kickoff returns was reduced by 25 percent by having the fair catch and while coaches were in favor of the change, they would like to see it go further.

“The double-team on the kickoff has become a much more impactful play in relation to the number of injuries that occur to the individual that is getting double-teamed, or the student-athletes who are double-teaming. Because of this, the AFCA Rules Committee is asking the NCAA Rules Committee to ban any double-teams on the kickoff play. Again, all of our coaches are in favor of this move,” Berry said.

•••••••

The coaches discussed the transfer rules and came to the agreement that they do not support the undergraduate transfer where players are immediately eligible to play. They believe that is not fair to the coaches or their teams.

“Coaches are not against transfers as a whole because if we were, we would not be in support of the graduate transfer. The coaches whole-heartedly support the graduate transfer, which allows a student-athlete, regardless if they are a starter or not, to transfer wherever they want and continue on with their education in the master’s program of their choosing,” Berry said.

•••••••

Another push by AFCA is the elimination of playing college football games on Friday night.

“Friday nights should be a sanctuary for our high school football programs and they should be free of college distractions,” adds Berry. “… It’s not just high school football that is hurt, but it’s the band, the concessions and everyone associated with that high school program who benefits from the finances of those high school games. It seems very strange to invade the territory of the hand that is feeding college football because that is where college programs get their student-athletes from.”

Coaches liken eliminating playing games on Friday nights to the NFL agreeing not to play games on Saturdays and that this move would help protect the scholastic model and empower high school coaches in the recruiting process.

There were 35 games on Friday nights last season in the Football Bowl Subdivision not counting the 15 games on Thanksgiving weekend.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me