NCAA wrestling tournament Session 1 recap: Penn State dominant in opening round |
U.S./World Sports

NCAA wrestling tournament Session 1 recap: Penn State dominant in opening round

Doug Gulasy
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Penn State’s Anthony Cassar defeats Antonio Pelusi of Franklin & Marshall in the 285-pound bout during the NCAA wrestling championships on Thursday, March 21, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

More than 300 wrestlers took the mats Thursday afternoon at PPG Paints Arena for the preliminary and first rounds of the NCAA wrestling championships.

Penn State, which won seven of the past eight championships, held the team lead after the end of the first session with 21 points, ahead of Ohio State (15.5) and Oklahoma State (14.5). All nine of the Nittany Lions’ competitors won their first-round duals, including five pins and two major decisions. Two-time national champions Jason Nolf (Kittanning), Vincenzo Joseph (Central Catholic) and Bo Nickal all had pins for Penn State.

Other notables from Thursday afternoon’s session:

Biggest upset: By seed, this would go to Iowa’s Sam Stoll (No. 29) over Michigan’s Mason Parris (No. 5) by 8-5 decision at heavyweight. However, Stoll, a returning All-American, began the season ranked No. 1 before dealing with injury. A big upset came at 149, where Virginia Tech’s 26th-seeded Ryan Blees beat seventh-seeded Kaden Gfeller of Oklahoma State, 3-1. Blees, who came into the tournament 16-14 on the season, began his career at Oklahoma State before transferring.

Best match: Oklahoma State’s Joe Smith nearly pulled off the biggest upset of the first round: Seeded 33rd at 165 pounds, he gave No. 1 seed Alex Marinelli everything he could handle before Marinelli prevailed, 7-4. Smith, a two-time All-American who wrestled most of the season at 174 pounds, held a 4-1 lead after two first-period takedowns, but Marinelli recovered, taking the lead for good on a third-period takedown.

Best local match: Oklahoma’s Jake Woodley, a North Allegheny graduate, went as far as he could go in his 197-pound first-round match against Appalachian State’s Randall Diabe. Each wrestler used three escapes to score three points through three regulation and six overtime periods, and Woodley earned the 4-3 victory thanks to a four-second edge in riding time. “I knew that was going to be a tough match, but that was huge,” said Woodley, who lost, 5-3, to Diabe earlier this season.

Don’t blink: Jason Nolf holds Penn State’s career pins record, and he showed why in the first round. The Kittanning graduate took down Duke’s Ben Anderson in the first 30 seconds of their 157-pound bout, and he secured the fall at the 42-second mark. It was the 60th pin of Nolf’s illustrious career.

Elite 11: Of the 21 former WPIAL wrestlers who qualified for the NCAA tournament in their hometown, 11 advanced to the second round: Iowa’s Spencer Lee (Franklin Regional) at 125 pounds; Pitt’s Micky Phillippi (Derry) and Ohio State’s Luke Pletcher (Latrobe) at 133; Illinois’ Mike Carr (South Fayette) at 141; Nolf at 157; Joseph, Arizona State’s Josh Shields (Franklin Regional) and Ohio State’s Te’Shan Campbell (Penn Hills) at 174; Virginia Tech’s Zack Zavatsky (Latrobe) and Pitt’s Nino Bonaccorsi (Bethel Park) at 184; and Woodley at 197.

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.