Next up for IUP women: The Elite Eight |
District College

Next up for IUP women: The Elite Eight

Bill Beckner
IUP’s Carolyn Appleby drives to the hoop against Cal (Pa.)’s Bianca Jasper on March 18, 2019, in the NCAA Division II Atlantic Regional Championship in Glenville, W.Va.

The IUP women’s basketball team will be seeking a second straight trip to the NCAA Division II Final Four.

The Crimson Hawks (29-3), seeded third in the Elite Eight (national quarterfinals) will meet No. 6 Azusa Pacific (28-5) at noon on Tuesday at Ohio Dominican’s Alumni Hall in Columbus as the NCAA Tournament rolls on.

IUP won the Atlantic Region with a 68-60 win over rival Cal U.

Azusa Pacific, which plays in the PacWest Conference, edged past Alaska Anchorage, 65-63, to take the West Region title. Freshman Lydia Nieto made a 3-pointer at the buzzer for the Cougars.

IUP and Azusa Pacific never have played each other in women’s basketball. The men’s teams met in the 2015 Elite Eight.

After defeating Stonehill in last year’s quarterfinals, IUP lost to top-seeded Ashland in the semifinals in Sioux Falls, S.D.

Scouting report

IUP (29-3) vs. Azusa Pacific (28-5)

Noon Tuesday at Ohio Dominican, Columbus, Ohio

Winner plays: Winner of Southwestern Oklahoma (33-1) and Saint Anslem (22-9) at 6 p.m. Wednesday in semifinals

Coaches: Tom McConnell, IUP; T.J. Hardeman, Azusa Pacific

Points scored/allowed per game: IUP, 76.6/54.4; Azusa Pacific, 76.4/62.4

Top players: IUP — Carolyn Appleby, Sr., PG (18 ppg), Brittany Robinson, Sr., F (12.2 ppg/7.1 rpg), Lauren Wolosik, R-Sr., G (12 ppg), Lexi Griggs, Jr., G-F (10.8 ppg); Azusa Pacific: Savanna Hanson, Jr., G, (15.4 ppg/8.3 rpg), Laura Pranger, So., F (11.8 ppg), Zoe March, Jr., G (11.4 ppg), Daylee Hanson, Jr., G (10.9 ppg), Rachel Bozlee, Jr., G (10.6 ppg)

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.