NFL Draft Day 1 recap: What Devin Bush means for Steelers |

NFL Draft Day 1 recap: What Devin Bush means for Steelers

Matt Rosenberg
In this Oct. 20, 2018, file photo, Michigan linebacker Devin Bush follows the ball during the first half against Michigan State in East Lansing, Mich.

Pittsburgh Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert worked his magic, trading up for the Broncos’ first-round pick to select Michigan inside linebacker Devin Bush at No. 10 in the NFL Draft.

Bush was among the most-coveted linebackers in the draft, and most expected he would not have been available by the time the Steelers selected at No. 20.

So what does this selection mean for the Steelers?


• The Steelers pulled off the first trade of Day 1 in order to draft Bush >> Read more

• How the rest of the AFC North fared in the first round and what’s next >> Read more

• A look at Bush’s collegiate stats and highlights >> Read more

• Kyler Murray goes No. 1 overall to Arizona. Plus, the rest of the first round >> Read more

• Bush gets emotional while listening to a message from his family >> Read more


• Tim Benz believes the pick comes a year too late, but it finally addresses the team’s most-glaring need >> Read more

• Kevin Gorman says the Steelers made the move in an effort to tackle the present, not the future >> Read more

• Joe Rutter and Tim Benz discuss how the Steelers were able to swing the trade and what happens now for the Steelers >> Read more

• See what national media experts are saying about the Bush selection >> Read more


• Joe Rutter looks ahead to the rest of the draft and what areas the Steelers might tackle >> Read more

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.