NFL upholds Myles Garrett’s suspension, cuts Steelers’ Maurkice Pouncey’s to 2 games | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

NFL upholds Myles Garrett’s suspension, cuts Steelers’ Maurkice Pouncey’s to 2 games

Chris Adamski

One week after the helmet slam heard ‘round the world, the NFL finalized its discipline for the primary Pittsburgh Steelers and Cleveland Browns involved.

Cleveland defensive lineman Myles Garrett had his suspension for the remainder of this season upheld by appeals officer James Thrash, the league announced Thursday. Garrett, who still must apply to the commissioner’s office for reinstatement in 2020., was given the punishment for removing the helmet of Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph and slamming him on the head with it

Another appeals officer appointed jointly by the NFL and NFLPA, Derrick Brooks, reduced the suspension given to Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey. Pouncey’s penalty was lowered from a three-game ban to two games for the All-Pro center’s punches and kicks directed toward Garrett after Garrett’s acts toward Rudolph.

Pouncey’s fine of $35,096 was upheld.


On Wednesday, the NFL announced it was upholding the one-game suspension given Browns defensive lineman Larry Ogunjobi for his shove of Rudolph. Thrash, however, rescinded the supplemental fine of $10,527 that had been assessed to Ogunjobi.

—Chris Adamski

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .


1973564_web1_1956418-b4f9d6efb32c4b73ad0e4910cfa9d008
AP
Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett walks off the field after he was ejected late in the fourth quarter of a game against the Pittsburgh Steelers last week. Garrett’s seasonlong suspension for slamming Mason Rudolph’s helmet off his bare head
Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.