ShareThis Page
NFL

Report: Eagles reach out to Bills about LeSean McCoy trade

| Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018, 4:33 p.m.
Buffalo Bills running back LeSean McCoy runs during the first half against the Tennessee Titans, Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018, in Orchard Park, N.Y.
Buffalo Bills running back LeSean McCoy runs during the first half against the Tennessee Titans, Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018, in Orchard Park, N.Y.
Buffalo Bills running back LeSean McCoy in action against the Tennessee Titans on Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018, in Orchard Park, N.Y.
Buffalo Bills running back LeSean McCoy in action against the Tennessee Titans on Sunday, Oct. 7, 2018, in Orchard Park, N.Y.

Bringing back their all-time rushing leader is something the Philadelphia Eagles are considering, according to a report.

Josh Reed of WIVB in Buffalo reported Tuesday that the Eagles have called the Buffalo Bills about trading for LeSean McCoy, who spent his first six NFL seasons in Philadelphia before being traded to the Bills by former coach Chip Kelly.

McCoy, a former Pitt product, departed with three franchise marks that still stand: most career rushing yards (6,792), most rushing yards in a season (1,607) and most in a game (217).

The Eagles have a void at running back in the wake of losing starter Jay Ajayi (knee) for the season on Monday. Ajayi has a torn ACL.

Immediately after they revealed Ajayi’s injury came a report from ESPN that they restructured defensive tackle Fletcher Cox ‘s massive contract to free up $6.5 million in salary cap space this year and $11.7 next year.

McCoy makes a base salary of $6.075 million this year, according to Over The Cap. The Eagles would be responsible for whatever proration of that is calculated to be following any deal to acquire him.

As for Le’Veon Bell, the report quotes an Eagles source as saying the restructure was not done with the intention of pursuing the Steelers ’ disgruntled star.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me