TMZ’s 911 tape: Le’Veon Bell’s robbers were 2 women he left naked in his bed |

TMZ’s 911 tape: Le’Veon Bell’s robbers were 2 women he left naked in his bed

Steven Adams
New York Jets running back Le’Veon Bell speaks to reporters at the team’s NFL football training facility in Florham Park, N.J., Tuesday, June 4, 2019.

New York Jets running back Le’Veon Bell was unable to give a clothing description of the women who allegedly robbed him because they were not wearing any, according to a recording that TMZ claims is Bell’s call to 911.

The former Pittsburgh Steeler reported that he was robbed May 25 by two women in his Hollywood, Fla., home. The police report estimated the value of the missing items as $520,000.

The dispatcher in TMZ’s recording asks the caller to give the ages of the suspects, which he gives as 23 and 21. The police will also need a clothing description so they can drive through the neighborhood and look for the suspects. That’s when things get a little awkward.

The caller says he went for his normal workout and left the first suspect “in the bed not wearing clothes.”

The dispatcher asks about the second suspect and the voice, presumed to be Bell, says, “She was in the bed too. They didn’t have clothes on.”

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.