NHL apologizes to Golden Knights; Refs won’t work next round | TribLIVE.com
NHL

NHL apologizes to Golden Knights; Refs won’t work next round

1074704_web1_1074704-0f16f879dff64a1694ccf2a54a23bc7c
AP
Sharks center Joe Pavelski (right) lies on the ice next to Golden Knights center Cody Eakin on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, during the third period of Game 7 of their first-round playoff series in San Jose, Calif.

LAS VEGAS — The owner of the Vegas Golden Knights said Thursday a senior NHL executive phoned him to apologize for a penalty called during Game 7 of his team’s loss to the San Jose Sharks.

Owner Bill Foley said the call came the morning after Vegas lost 5-4 in overtime Tuesday night to end the first-round series. Foley said at a news conference the call came from an executive who is “about as senior as you can get,” but he did not want to identify him.

The play in question was a major penalty on Cody Eakin of the Golden Knights that Foley described as “infuriating.”

The owner said the executive admitted it was a “bad call,” and the league did “acknowledge” it. Foley said the apology made him “feel a little better after that.”

Foley said he was sitting with injured forward Erik Haula in a suite at SAP Center when Eakin cross-checked Sharks captain Joe Pavelski in the chest with 10 minutes, 47 seconds to play and the Knights winning 3-0. Paul Stastny bumped Pavelski as he fell to the ice, where he was knocked out and bleeding on the ice.

The officials conferred on the unreviewable play while a dazed Pavelski was helped to the locker room with a towel pressed to his head. Eakin was assessed a 5-minute penalty for cross-checking and a game misconduct. The Sharks scored four goals on the ensuing power play.

ESPN reported referees Dan O’Halloran and Eric Furlatt, who were on the ice for the call, will not work the second round. O’Halloran has officiated more playoff games than any active ref, and he is expected to be omitted from the conference finals for the first time in more than 10 years. A league source told ESPN refs who don’t work rounds earlier in the postseason generally are not included later in the playoffs.

Series supervisor Don VanMassenhoven said the major penalty was given because the cross-check caused a significant injury.

“The game was ours, it was over, 3-zip,” Foley said. “We were looking, saying, ‘All we gotta do is play some defense, play defense and stay out of the box.’ Within 30 seconds, 5-minute major. It wasn’t a penalty. Painful.”

San Jose coach Peter DeBoer said Pavelski is listed as day-to-day but is not expected to be cleared for Game 1 of the second-round series against the Colorado Avalanche on Friday night.

DeBoer downplayed the league’s call to Foley.

“I haven’t gotten many of their calls where they made a mistake,” DeBoer said. “There were a couple earlier in that series where I would have appreciated a call. We’re past that. We’re on to the next opponent now.”

Categories: Sports | NHL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.