ShareThis Page

Bobby Orr's goal remains top Stanley Cup moment

| Monday, Dec. 25, 2017, 8:59 p.m.
Dan Jacobson, left, of Quincy, Mass. poses near a statue of Boston Bruins legend Bobby Orr prior to Game 2 of an NHL hockey second-round playoff series between the Boston Bruins and the Montreal Canadiens in Boston, Saturday, May 3, 2014. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Dan Jacobson, left, of Quincy, Mass. poses near a statue of Boston Bruins legend Bobby Orr prior to Game 2 of an NHL hockey second-round playoff series between the Boston Bruins and the Montreal Canadiens in Boston, Saturday, May 3, 2014. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Growing up in Brantford, Ontario, Wayne Gretzky always heard his father, Walter, wax poetic about Bill Barilko's 1951 Stanley Cup-winning goal for the Toronto Maple Leafs.

“We didn't really even have TV back then and there was kind of clips of it, there was kind of pictures of it — moments of it, so to speak,” Gretzky said.

At age 9, Gretzky watched in the same kind of awe as Bobby Orr scored in overtime to win the Cup in 1970 for the Boston Bruins. Orr beat St. Louis Blues goaltender Glenn Hall, leaping through the air to celebrate what has become the most iconic goal in NHL history.

“People from the '50s and '60s remember the Barilko goal and then the new generation of kids who got to see the goal like myself could relate to what our parents and grandparents were talking about,” Gretzky said. “Time sort of stopped in a moment that you could compare something so unique.”

“The Great One” downplays his own accomplishments but considers Orr's goal an unforgettable moment in hockey history. As the NHL celebrates its 100th anniversary, Orr's goal is so important that it reached the finals of the “Greatest Moments” bracket 47 years after it happened.

While Barilko's goal inspired the Tragically Hip song “Fifty Mission Cap,” Orr's has inspired decades of highlights and conversation.

Almost 50 years later, the goal is still revered and remembered, from Ray Lussier's timeless photo to Dan Kelly's play-by-play call of Orr's give-and-go with Derek Sanderson to complete the Boston sweep. Orr's goal was voted one of the two most memorable moments in NHL history finishing behind only Mario Lemieux scoring goals five different ways in one game in 1988.

Many current fans weren't alive when Orr scored the goal, let alone remember it. Yet among the 17 Cup-winning overtime goals, it sticks out as the most memorable.

“There's some moments in hockey that are just so special that we'll never be able to ever sort of recreate that moment again,” Gretzky said. “And that's one of those iconic moments that we'll never be able to recreate.”

It has become such a flashpoint that Orr recalled in the NHL's 100 years documentary: “Each time I see Glenn Hall, Glenn says, ‘Is that the only goal you ever scored?' ”

It was actually one of nine goals Orr scored in 24 games during the 1970 playoffs.

So why has Orr's goal become one of the central moments in hockey history? Lussier's snapshot, Orr's legendary career, the advent of television and the importance of the goal for the Bruins' franchise all contribute.

Lussier took the famous photo for the Boston Record American, and re-creations of it are everywhere, including on the wall of TD Garden where the Bruins now play. Orr saw it in the newspaper the next morning in its full glory.

“That picture, it's probably one of the top five photographs in sports journalism — not just hockey,” said actor Jon Hamm of “Mad Men” fame, a longtime Blues fan from St. Louis. “It's amazing.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me