NHL’s top scorers, including Penguins’ Sidney Crosby, going nowhere fast in playoffs | TribLIVE.com

NHL’s top scorers, including Penguins’ Sidney Crosby, going nowhere fast in playoffs

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Sidney Crosby during practice Saturday, April 13, 2019 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.

For decades, it generally has been an accepted part of hockey lore: The playoffs are where high-flying offenses go to die.

Over the past three seasons, the Pittsburgh Penguins and Washington Capitals have done their part to change that attitude, winning the Stanley Cup on the backs of their generational scoring stars.

This season, though, the league’s most productive offensive players seem to be going nowhere fast.

In the regular season, six NHL players reached the 100-point mark.

Nikita Kucherov had a brilliant year for Tampa Bay, racking up 41 goals and 128 points. The Lightning lost the first three games of a first-round series with Columbus, scoring a total of five goals. Kucherov didn’t have a point in the first two games, then sat out Game 3 on a suspension.

The players in spots two through four in the NHL scoring race — Edmonton’s Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl and Chicago’s Patrick Kane — didn’t make the playoffs.

Sidney Crosby and Brad Marchand tied for fifth with 100 points. Marchand’s Boston Bruins dropped two of their first three first-round games against Toronto, and the offensive struggles of the Penguins have been well documented.

They scored a total of five goals in three losses to the New York Islanders, and Crosby didn’t record a point.

“We all know what we need to do to be successful in the playoffs,” winger Patric Hornqvist said. “We have to give the Islanders a lot of credit, too. They defend really hard. They have five guys in front of their net.”

Islanders coach Barry Trotz doesn’t see a seismic shift toward defense starting in the NHL. He just sees a few defensive teams playing some good hockey.

“You play to your identity,” he said. “What you do is what you do, and if you do it better than the other team, you’re going to have success. I think there’s no formula. You look at it over the course of time. All kinds of teams have won. Teams that can stay to their identity and play that way usually have good success.”

Penguins coach Mike Sullivan said teams, even those led by superstar scorers, need to have a flexible offense once the postseason starts.

“Playoff hockey is hard hockey,” he said. “Do you have to play a different style? I don’t think so. I think good teams create offense different ways, and then you just have to take what the game gives you out there. I think that’s the most important thing.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.