Penguins move Jake Guentzel to top power-play unit for Game 4 |

Penguins move Jake Guentzel to top power-play unit for Game 4

Kevin Gorman

Jake Guentzel talked about Game 4 being a chance for the Pittsburgh Penguins to do “something special,” and that starts with moving the winger to the top special-teams unit.

Looking for a way to spark the Penguins with a man advantage in the Stanley Cup playoffs, coach Mike Sullivan switched the team’s top goal scorer to the top power-play unit.

Sullivan’s explanation for the move was as much out of self-deprecation as desperation, with the Penguins trailing the New York Islanders, 3-0, going into Game 4 on Tuesday night at PPG Paints Arena.

“I joke with Jake a lot sometimes,” Sullivan said. “I always say to him, ‘Do you ever go home and say, ‘This coach is crazy. I’m the leading goal scorer on the team and I’m on the second power play?’ There’s some validity to that.”

In a lighter moment amid tense times, Sullivan was asked about the response he got from Guentzel, who scored 40 goals in the regular season for the first time in his career.

“His answer was politically correct,” Sullivan said, with a smile. “He said, ‘We’ve got a pretty good power play.’ ”

The Penguins, however, entered Game 4 at 1 for 8 on the power play in this series, including 0 for 3 in Game 3 on Sunday at home, but Sullivan believes they are close to scoring.

Guentzel replaces Patric Hornqvist in the hope his presence around the net can create room for shooters and he can use his touch to find the net, whether with deflections or rebounds.

“I think they’ve been getting chances,” said Guentzel, who had six goals and five assists on the power play during the regular season. “It’s just that sometimes the bounces aren’t going the right way. I’m going to try to get to the front of the net and create some space for them.”

Guentzel has had his share of scoring opportunities — Sullivan said he and the coaching staff counted three “high-quality chances” in Game 3 — but had yet to register a point through the first three games of the best-of-seven series.

“Jake had some pretty good scoring chances in the last game,” Sullivan said. “He usually scores when he gets those looks. We’ll just stay with it. He’s a good player. We have some flexibility with our power play. We’ve moved different guys there all year long. This isn’t anything new and our group is familiar with it.”

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Jake Guentzel clears the puck past the Islanders’ Tom Kuhnhackl in the second period Sunday, April 14, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.