North Allegheny grad honored by Harvard tennis program |
Other Local

North Allegheny grad honored by Harvard tennis program

Karen Kadilak
Harvard athletics
North Allegheny graduate Anna Li
Harvard athletics
North Allegheny graduate Anna Li competes for Harvard during the 2019 season.

North Allegheny graduate and Harvard sophomore women’s tennis player Anna Li worked hard off the court, and it paid off.

Li, 20, of McCandless, was the recipient of the Crimson’s Most Outstanding in Strength and Conditioning Award.

Li said her junior coaches always emphasized conditioning, and she loved being challenged by her twin sister, Tina, who plays for Navy, in the weight room.

“My college coaches value conditioning both to build strength and to prevent injuries,” said Li, the 2015 WPIAL and PIAA Class AAA singles runner-up and 2014 PIAA runner-up who led North Allegheny to three PIAA titles. “I will be on the courts and in the gym plenty this summer.

“I would love to win the Ivy League title as a team.”

Li, who is studying statistics, went 12-2 in singles, including 5-1 in dual matches. She finished the season with four consecutive victories.

In doubles, she tallied 13 wins.

She helped the Crimson (17-7, 5-2) to second place behind Princeton in the Ivy League.

“It’s been a pleasure working with Anna and seeing her growth on and off the court,” said Traci Green, the Sheila Kelly Palandjian Head Coach for Harvard Women’s Tennis. “She’s added a lot to her doubles and singles game via her hard work in practice and discipline in strength and conditioning.

“Her amazing grit and mental toughness in the gym and on the court have been a huge key to our success.”

Karen Kadilak is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.