North Huntingdon native Austen Swankler ends USHL’s longest playoff game with goal | TribLIVE.com
Other Local

North Huntingdon native Austen Swankler ends USHL’s longest playoff game with goal

Paul Schofield
1044418_web1_NS-AustinSwankler2-021617

Irwin native Austen Swankler ended the longest game in United States Hockey League history Thursday morning by scoring the game-winning goal at 2:57 of the fourth overtime to give Sioux Falls a 3-2 victory against Sioux City.

The game lasted 122 minutes and 57 seconds.

The win helped Sioux Falls sweep the series and advance to the Western Conference semifinals, where it will play Waterloo starting Friday.

Swankler, a Michigan commit, spent the 2017-18 season playing for the Oakland (Mich.) Jr. Grizzlies where he scored 38 goals and added 65 assists in 63 games.

Playing at that level got Swankler noticed around the hockey world, and he could be the next Western Pennsylvania player to be drafted into the NHL.

He scored 11 goals and has 25 assists in 44 games for Sioux Falls.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Other Local
Tags:
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.