‘Obligatory PSU Pregame’ examines spring football, dissects wrestling team’s NCAA chances | TribLIVE.com
Penn State

‘Obligatory PSU Pregame’ examines spring football, dissects wrestling team’s NCAA chances

After goofing off for months following Penn State’s Citrus Bowl loss to Kentucky, “The Obligatory PSU Pregame” gang is back.

Brandon Noble, a former Nittany Lions defensive tackle; Mike “the Mailman” Herr, a beloved Happy Valley retired postal carrier; Chris Buchignani, founding president of The Nittany Valley Society; and Kevin Horne, proud holder of three Penn State degrees and former managing editor of Onward State, air their last complaints about 2018, look ahead to spring football, appreciate the dominance of Cael Sanderson’s wrestlers and ponder crazy postseasons dreams for men’s hockey … and even basketball.

Trib Total Media is partnering with Blue White Media to distribute the weekly video podcast on the new TribLIVE Podcast Network.

Herr expounds on why this year’s wrestling squad is gonna roll into Pittsburgh as a heavy favorite to win another national championship, and Horne brings some amazing beer.

College Videos

Lots to catch up on and talk about as the gang wraps up the winter sports and heads into the spring.


Blue White Media
“The Obligatory PSU Pregame Show”
Categories: Sports | College | Penn State
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.