ShareThis Page
Oklahoma quarterback Austin Kendall transfers to WVU |

Oklahoma quarterback Austin Kendall transfers to WVU

Jerry DiPaola
| Friday, January 18, 2019 1:03 p.m
in the first half of an NCAA college football game in Norman, Okla., Saturday, Sept. 29, 2018. (AP Photo/Alonzo Adams)

West Virginia coach Neal Brown didn’t waste any time replenishing his roster at a position where he may need some depth.

Brown, who was announced as Dana Holgorsen’s replacement Jan. 11, said Friday that quarterback Austin Kendall has enrolled for West Virginia’s spring semester and will have two years of eligibility as a graduate transfer. He will compete for the starting job with rising junior Jack Allison, who directed the WVU offense in the Camping World Bowl in the absence of Will Grier.

Grier, who was the West Virginia quarterback the past two seasons, opted out of the bowl game to prepare for the NFL Draft. Allison completed 17 of 35 passes for 277 yards and one interception in the 34-18 loss to Syracuse.

Kendall, 6-foot-2, 219 pounds, was a backup to Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray last season, appearing in six games and completing 12 of 17 passes for 122 yards and a touchdown. He also appeared in two games in 2016 after throwing for 7,088 yards and 72 touchdowns at Cuthbertson (N.C.) High School. He was rated a four-star prospect and the No. 4 pro-style quarterback in the nation by while receiving scholarship offer from West Virginia, Auburn, Clemson, Miami, N.C. State, Tennessee and Oklahoma.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.