ShareThis Page
Other Local

Latrobe's Pevarnik, FR's Jackson team up for WPGA in Palmer Cup triumph

Paul Schofield
| Thursday, Sept. 21, 2017, 9:18 p.m.
Latrobe's Brady Pevarnik competes at the Palmer Cup on Sept. 21, 2017, at Latrobe Country Club.
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
Latrobe's Brady Pevarnik competes at the Palmer Cup on Sept. 21, 2017, at Latrobe Country Club.
Latrobe's Brady Pevarnik and Franklin Regional's Palmer Jackson compete at the Palmer Cup on Sept. 21, 2017, at Latrobe Country Club.
Paul Schofield | Tribune-Review
Latrobe's Brady Pevarnik and Franklin Regional's Palmer Jackson compete at the Palmer Cup on Sept. 21, 2017, at Latrobe Country Club.

For Brady Pevarnik and Palmer Jackson, getting a chance to play against some of the top golf professionals from Western Pennsylvania was one thing.

But helping the West Penn Golf Association's top amateurs win the 22nd Palmer Cup was even better.

The two high school juniors — Pevarnik from Latrobe and Jackson from Franklin Regional — are two of the top players in the WPIAL and the state. They also were the youngest players to compete in the event at age 16.

They helped the WPGA to its fourth consecutive Palmer Cup victory, 13-4 against the Tri-State PGA pros. The TSPGA leads the all-time series 15-6-1.

Pevarnik defeated Gordon Vietmeier, 4 and 3, in the morning singles matches and then teamed up with Jackson in the afternoon four-ball matches to defeat Aaron Gizzi and Gene Walter, 2-up.

“It's such a great honor to be invited to play in this event, especially since I was named after Mr. Palmer,” Jackson said. “This is really special.”

The annual event was named after the late Latrobe legend of golf, Arnold Palmer, in 1996. Palmer passed away almost a year ago, days after the 21st event.

There were many times that Palmer competed in the event for the Tri-State PGA team, and each year he'd compete against a different player.

“He wanted all the amateurs to experience a match against him,” WPGA president Terry Teasdale said.

The WPGA squad also included USGA Senior Amateur champion Sean Knapp, David Brown, Nathan Smith and Rick Stimmel. The Tri-State PGA squad was missing John Aber, Rob McClellan and Kevin Shields, who all had prior commitments.

The amateur grabbed an 8.5-1.5 lead in the morning singles matches. Many of the matches were close, but the amateurs prevailed.

The one that wasn't as close was Pevarnik's and Vietmeier's match.

“It started close,” Vietmeier said. “I put one close on No. 1 and he bounced back to sink a long birdie on No. 2. “We went back-and-forth until No. 8; that's when Brady took the lead for good. He was a perfect 3 for 3 from the bunkers. That was impressive. He's an excellent player, very mature.”

Vietmeier said Pevarnik stayed calm and was never rattled.

“I got a little nervous after he cut my 2-up lead to 1 with a birdie on No. 12,” Pevarnik said. “But I made a big putt on No. 13 to win the hole, and then I finished with consecutive birdies.”

The birdie on No. 15, another bunker save, was applauded by Vietmeier.

“I never expected a high school player to hand me my worst loss in this event,” Vietmeier said. “These kids are learning the game fast and competing in college type events at age 14. The AJGA (American Junior Golf Association) events are really helping these kids.”

Pevarnik said competing in the event was not only fun, but a confidence-booster

“Palmer played great in the afternoon,” Pevarnik said. “We were ham and egging (feeding off each other) it. It's an awesome event, and we were treated so well.”

Jackson added: “This was so fun. I was glad they paired me up with Brady. I couldn't have asked for a better partner.”

Both are looking forward to the opportunity to play in the event again. The Tri-State PGA squad hopes they turn pro soon so they can play on the other side.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me