ShareThis Page
Other Local

Quinn Construction makes most of opportunities in rout of South Hills

| Friday, June 20, 2014, 11:45 p.m.
South Hills John Bachman delivers a pitch against Quinn Construction during Daily News League baseball action on Friday, June 20, 2014, at Clairton.
Ronald Vezzani Jr. | For the Daily News
South Hills John Bachman delivers a pitch against Quinn Construction during Daily News League baseball action on Friday, June 20, 2014, at Clairton.

Nothing about this Daily News League game was pretty.

While the poor field conditions at Clairton Park and the steady dose of rain were most noticeable, they paled in comparison to the display Quinn Construction and DNL newbie South Hills put on for 2½ hours.

• A combined 18 walks.

• A combined six errors.

• A combined 12 unearned runs.

• A combined 17 stranded runners.

The difference was Quinn was able to overcome its mistakes and South Hills was not.

Despite 14 walks, including nine by starter Anthony Garofalo within the first 15 batters he faced, the defending league champions were able to take advantage of four fourth-inning errors that led to nine unearned runs to come away with a 12-3 win over South Hills.

“It wasn't pretty,” Quinn manager Tom Simcho said.

Especially difficult when one considers it was one of the DNL's top pitchers on the mound for Quinn.

Garofalo went 4-1 with a 2.16 ERA last year and brought in a 2.40 ERA into Friday's game despite having a 1-2 record. The Plum graduate had walked eight batters in 13 13 innings this year. He had seven through two innings against the Snappers.

“I have no explanation for it,” Simcho said. “Maybe you just have days like that. He wasn't using anything as an excuse. He just said, ‘I can't throw strikes.' I have never seen that out of him before.”

Garofalo lasted just three innings and gave up only one hit.

However, South Hills couldn't cash in the free passes. All the Snappers had to show for nine walks in three innings was a Jon Leber RBI single and seven runners left on base.

“We just couldn't hit the ball,” South Hills player/manager Clarke White said. “We had some bad base running as well. That's been our Achilles all year. We have been killing ourselves on the base paths.”

South Hills had runners thrown out at home and third in the first and at second in the second inning.

“You add that to not being able to hit, and you lose,” White said.

Luke Hils picked up the win in relief of Garofalo.

He threw the final four-plus innings, giving up two hits and two runs.

John Bachman took the loss for South Hills (5-4). Bachman went 3 13 innings, allowing six hits and 12 runs (none earned). Matt Shoemaker pitched the final 2 23 innings.

“It doesn't help your cause when you boot the ball around like we did,” White said.

With the score 3-1 in the fourth, Quinn (4-5) took control but not without some help from South Hills. Four errors led to all nine runs as Quinn, which was forced to play with six Legion players, sent 12 to the plate.

Zack Miller, Adam Becker, Joe Stavor, Todd Sekowski and Ryan Kandsberger knocked in runs in the inning to stake Quinn to a 12-1 lead.

“We got some bleeders, which we needed,” Simcho said. “What was good about this is that it is nice to know our younger kids can step up and play.

“Those kids know what I expect from them. When the older guys come around, they don't know things that I want. It wasn't actually a bad thing.”

Kandsberger, Becker and Sewkowski had two hits apiece, and Becker and Stavor had a pair of RBIs each.

Quinn resumes action today with a doubleheader: 3 p.m. at Klingensmith Insurance and 6 p.m. at Sakas Landscaping.

“Those games are big,” Simcho said. “We are battling for a playoff spot, and that will determine a lot.”

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me