Ouch! Bengals lose another first-round draft pick to injury | TribLIVE.com

Ouch! Bengals lose another first-round draft pick to injury

Joe Rutter
Cincinnati Bengals offensive tackle Jonah Williams walks the field during NFL football practice, Thursday, June 13, 2019, in Cincinnati. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

Another year, another first-round draft pick that is down and out for the lowly Cincinnati Bengals.

Already picked to finish at the bottom of the AFC North, the Bengals didn’t help their cause for escaping the basement Tuesday when they announced that first-rounder Jonah Williams, the No. 11 overall selection out of Alabama, will miss the 2019 season after having surgery to repair a torn labrum.

Williams was injured during organized team activities, but the Bengals said he merely was “dinged,” although they didn’t let the player speak to reporters about his health issues.

Williams’ injury continues the run of bad luck for the Bengals and their top draft picks. In 2018, center Billy Price dealt with foot injury that caused him to miss weeks 3-8. In 2017, speedy wide receiver John Ross was limited to 17 snaps over three games because of injuries. William Jackson, the Bengals’ first-rounder in 2016, tore a pectoral muscle in camp and missed the season. In 2015, the Bengals took tackle Cedric Ogbuehi in the first round even though he was coming off an ACL tear. Ogbuehi didn’t get on to the field until December of his rookie year.

With Williams out, the Bengals will have to look elsewhere for players to help them improve on last year’s 6-10 record.

The Pittsburgh Steelers play the Bengals on Sept. 30 at Heinz Field and Nov. 24 at Paul Brown Stadium.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.