ShareThis Page

'Best miss' helps West Newton man get state-record whitetail deer

Bob Frye
| Saturday, Jan. 6, 2018, 7:21 p.m.
Ron Shaulis (center) holds his record-breaking deer rack.
Pennsylvania Game Commission
Ron Shaulis (center) holds his record-breaking deer rack.

It was the luckiest miss of his life.

Ron Shaulis of West Newton was hunting in Forbes State Forest early in archery season. There were several big bucks around. He knew. He captured three of them on the trail cameras he was running since May.

One seemed exceptionally large.

But it was smart, too.

All of the pictures on his cameras showed it moving before daylight or after dark. So though he thought he had it patterned better than the other two bucks, 24 days into archery season he still had not seen it in the flesh.

Things were starting to feel hopeless.

So when a 10-point buck, big by anyone's standards, came by his tree stand set amongst some large beech trees, he decided to take it.

And he missed.

“It was a 20-yard shot, and I just missed. I shot right over its back,” Shaulis said.

What a break that was.

Later, on Oct. 24, Shaulis was back in his stand when the really big deer — the one he had been focusing on — showed up.

He killed it the first time he saw it at 32 yards.

He wasn't aware right away of what he had done. The deer was “huge,” he understood that. But he never considered it might be a state record whitetail until his taxidermist — a veteran of 20 years of mounting trophies — told him otherwise.

Shaulis moved to get the buck's rack scored.

Bob D'Angelo, coordinator of the big game records program for Pennsylvania Game Commission, did that live on Facebook on Dec. 4.

The buck indeed moved to the top of the charts. It's the new state record whitetail in the typical category, with a net score of 1854/8.

The previous record scored 1782/8. Micahel Nicola Sr. of Waterford killed it in Allegheny County in 2004.

D'Angelo said he immediately thought Shaulis' buck had a chance to take over the top spot. It had 13 points, with an inside spread of 202/8 inches. The left main beam was 25 inches, and the right main beam 262/8.

“Any time you see more than 25 inches in a main beam, that's pretty good,” he said.

Still, he didn't expect the rack to score quite as high as it did. He thought it might hit the low 180s.

By going even beyond that, it “smashed the record,” he said.

“It was even bigger than I thought,” D'Angelo added.

It's been that kind of season and decade, really.

D'Angelo said hunters added 171 bucks to the commission's record book last season. This year's total might surpass that, he said. That includes some giant deer.

On each of the next two Thursdays, for example, he'll be scoring two nontypical archery deer — one killed in Perry County, the other Clarion, both with a crossbow — that are likely to finish in the top five.

That's all part of a longterm trend. D'Angelo said the number of quality bucks has been climbing steadily, with Westmoreland County usually ranking in the top five statewide for big bucks produced.

“The numbers have been going up every year, ever since we started antler restrictions,” D'Angelo said. “It's been amazing.”

Shaulis' deer is evidence of that.

He killed nice bucks before, including a 10-point and a big 6 with no brow tines, near where he got his record. But none like this one — his record deer, the one he got the first time he saw it.

And all after a miss.

“That was my best miss ever,” he said. “My wife and buddies tell me that same thing all the time.”

Bob Frye is the editor. Reach him at 412-838-5148 or See other stories, blogs, videos and more at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me