ShareThis Page
Outdoors

Pheasant permit likely to be required of junior hunters

Bob Frye
| Saturday, Feb. 10, 2018, 5:39 p.m.
Junior hunters who want to put ringnecks in their game bag this fall likely will have to get a free pheasant permit first.
Pixabay
Junior hunters who want to put ringnecks in their game bag this fall likely will have to get a free pheasant permit first.

This probably won't be as controversial. Free rarely is.

Last year, Pennsylvania Game Commissioners created a $25 pheasant hunting permit and required it of adult hunters — all adult hunters — pursuing agency-stocked pheasants.

That included senior lifetime license holders.

That caused more than a bit of consternation. Seniors who thought the commission was breaking a contract with them complained to lawmakers, and at least one introduced a bill to exempt them from the pheasant permit.

That hasn't gone anywhere, and unless that changes, seniors will need to buy a permit again in 2018-19 if they want to chase ringnecks.

Junior hunters likely will need to get a permit, too.

At their recent meeting, commissioners gave preliminary approval to a proposal requiring junior hunters to get a pheasant permit.

Theirs, though, will be free. Even the add-on fees associated with all licenses — the $1 issuing-agent fee collected by the license seller and the 90-cent transaction fee collected by the operator of the license sales system — will be covered by grants, said Randy Shoup, chief of the commission's bureau of wildlife protection.

The reason for creating the permit is simple: information.

Commissioners said the idea is to "quantify the number of youth participating in pheasant hunting annually."

That's an unknown right now.

Prior to the 2017 pheasant season, estimates of the number of pheasant hunters were just that: estimates.

It now has a hard figure. The agency sold 42,767 permits.

That information is as valuable as the nearly $1 million in revenue the stamps generated, said one long-term agency employee turned outsider.

"You finally replaced estimates of hunters with real numbers. What you have done is provided data where there was none," said Dennis Duza, a retired commission employee who first pushed for creation of a pheasant permit.

Creating a youth permit would provide more information, he said.

"This is a good move, as once again it allows managers to secure actual data instead of relying on estimates," he said.

Others support the junior permit, too.

Harold Olay, president of the North Central PA Chapter of Pheasants Forever, said his membership has discussed the idea of a free permit and supports it so the commission can get more details on how many junior pheasant hunters are out there.

There's even a chance the permit could bring in money to the commission.

If it can show how many junior bird hunters it has, that data "might entitle the agency to additional funding for its pheasant program through federal hunter recruitment funding initiatives," a commission release said.

The junior permit is not a done deal. Commissioners must give the idea final approval.

That's expected as early as the board's next meeting in April.

Some changes — not yet revealed — could be coming to the pheasant program.

But in the meantime, commissioners say they're happy with how it's working out.

Commission president Tim Layton of Somerset County said all of the hunters he's heard from — who actually bought a permit and went hunting this past fall — were satisfied with the hunting, the birds and the season, he said. The ones he heard from were all "extremely happy with everything that happened this year."

"I don't recall a complaint," Layton said.

Bob Frye is the everybodyadventures.com editor. Reach him at 412-216-0193 or bfrye@535mediallc.com. See other stories, blogs, videos and more at everybodyadventures.com.

Article by Bob Frye, Everybody Adventures,

http://www.everybodyadventures.com

Copyright © 535media, LLC

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me